Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,415 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Payment Confirmation Establishes Filing Date In IPR Petitions

    In a Precedential Opinion Panel, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board held that confirmation of payment of fees via wire transfer was sufficient to establish a filing date for a petition for...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Performing A Claimed Method For Compensation Triggers The On-Sale Bar, Even Where No Product Is Sold

    In Quest Integrity USA, LLC v. Cokebusters USA Inc., No. 2017-2423 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgement invalidating three claims
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Petitioner Estopped Due To Final Written Decisions In Parallel IPR Proceedings With Petitions Filed Simultaneously

    In Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon LLC, No. 2020-1481 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2022), the Federal Circuit affirmed that Intuitive was estopped under § 315(e)(1)...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Petitioner Estopped Where Reference Cited In Prosecution History And On Face Of Patent-In-Suit Reasonably Could Have Been Raised In Prior IPR

    In Ford Motor Co. v. Paice LLC, IPR2015-00787, Paper 35 (Oct. 21, 2016), the Board dismissed Ford's inter partes review (IPR) challenge of a claim based on estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1)...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: Apple Inc. Vs. Fintiv Inc.

    In this special edition Finnegan podcast, Erika Arner and Kevin Rodkey discuss the PTAB's precedential decision in Apple Inc. vs. Fintiv Inc. and the effects it has had on PTAB practice, ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: August 2023 - Last Month At The Federal Circuit Podcast Series

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: Inventorship & The AIA: The Federal Circuit's First Derivation Decision - Part 2

    In this special two-episode podcast series, Finnegan partner Jeffrey Totten chats with Finnegan attorney Alissa Green about the Federal Circuit's inaugural ruling...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: June 2021 - Last Month At The Federal Circuit Podcast Series

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit – a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: Last Month At The Federal Circuit - October 2021

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit – a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: Sanya Sukduang And Tom Sullivan On The State Of Sandoz

    In June 2017, the Supreme Court announced its decisions in Sandoz v. Amgen and Amgen v. Sandoz – cases that examined how makers of biosimilars and branded biologic drugs bring products to market.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast Series: Last Month At The Federal Circuit - April 2022

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast Series: Last Month At The Federal Circuit - June 2022

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: Trenton Ward And Rachel Emsley On Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC And SAS Institute v. Iancu

    On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court handed down two opinions in cases related to inter partes review (IPR). In a 7-2 decision, the Court upheld the constitutionality of IPRs in Oil States Energy Services...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Process Discoverable By "Merely Ordinary Experimentation" Rendered Obvious

    In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira, Inc., No. 2017-1115 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 26, 2017), a divided Federal Circuit panel affirmed the district court's finding that a claimed process for making a chemical compound was obvious.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Products Utilizing Licensed Patents Are Not Necessarily Licensed

    In AlexSam, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc., No. 22-2036 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2024), the Federal Circuit found the district court erred in its evaluation of a license agreement...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Proposed Bill Would Empower U.S. Customs To Seize Products Infringing Design Patents At The Border

    On December 5, 2019, the Counterfeit Goods Seizure Act of 2019 (CGSA) was introduced to the U.S. Senate. If enacted into law, the CGSA would allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution First: Top 5 Of 2019!

    With 2019 in the rear-view mirror and 2020 in full swing, we take a moment to reflect on what posts rose to the top during 2019. Here is a listing of the Prosecution First's top five posts in 2019:
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution History Estoppel And Claim Vitiation Not Enough To Avoid Willful Infringement

    In Bio-Rad Labs., Inc. v. 10X Genomics Inc., No. 2019-2255 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 3, 2020), the Federal Circuit rejected 10X's prosecution history
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution Pointer 398

    At the USPTO, Patent Center is the next-generation system that incorporates all application submission types and file management functionality currently available in EFS-Web and Private PAIR...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution Pointer 427

    The USPTO's e-Petitions cannot be granted for petitions to revive an abandoned application if:
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 901–920 of 4415 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics