Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,415 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    IPO Recommendations For Changes To The Orange Book Listing Form 3542

    The FDA sought comments as part of its wide effort to modernize the Orange Book in Docket FDA-2020-N-1127 regarding the types of patent information listed in the Orange Book.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    IPR And CBM Statistics For Final Written Decisions Issued In August 2016

    In the 36 Final Written Decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in August, the Board cancelled 468 of the instituted claims and declined to cancel 213 of the instituted claims.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    IPR And CBM Statistics For Final Written Decisions Issued In February 2016

    In the 35 Final Written Decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in February, the Board cancelled 491 (79.45%) of the instituted claims and declined to cancel 112 (18.12%) of the instituted claims.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Is AI Pushing The Envelope Of IP Protection?

    The number of patent applications using artificial intelligence (AI) technology filed in the U.S. doubled between 2002 and 2018
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Lex Machina Releases Detailed Report On Patent Trial And Appeal Board Proceedings

    Lex Machina has released a report providing insight into proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board from its inception in September 2012 through December 2015.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Librarian Of Congress Adopts New Exemptions Under Section 1201 Of The DMCA

    Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") generally makes it unlawful to circumvent technological measures used to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works, including copyrighted books...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Litigation Developments: Delaware Infringement Suit Ongoing In The Prolitec Inc./ScentAir Technologies, LLC Patent Disputes

    On July 24, 2020, Prolitec Inc. filed a further patent suit against ScentAir Technologies, LLC, complaining of infringement and asserting several additional patents.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Maximizing The Likelihood Of A Litigation Stay Pending Inter Partes Review

    In enacting the Leahy-Smith AIA, Congress sought to "establish a more efficient and streamlined patent system that [would] improve patent quality and limit unnecessary and counterproductive litigation costs."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    New Simpler And Easier PPH Formalities

    The new Global Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) pilot is the next step in an effort to harmonize and simplify the PPH platform.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    New Vision Wins Another Chance To Defend Gaming Patents Following Arthrex Remand

    In New Vision Gaming & Dev., Inc. v. SG Gaming, Inc., No. 2020-1399 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2021), the Federal Circuit vacated two covered-business method review final written decisions...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    No Same-Party Or New Issue Joinder For IPRs At The PTAB

    In Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, No. 2018-1400 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2020) the Federal Circuit found that the text of 35 U.S.C. § 315(c) ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Not All Expirations [Re] Secured Settled Expectations For Petitioner

    Acting USPTO Director Coke Morgan Stewart's decision in Omnivision Technologies, Inc. v. Re Secured Networks, LLC, IPR2025-01019, Paper 14 (PTAB Oct. 10, 2025) serves as an illustration...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Not An Abstract Way To Pump Iron: Federal Circuit Reverses Dismissal Of Claims For Automatic Adjustable Dumbbells As Patent Ineligible

    In PowerBlock Holdings Inc. v. iFIT Inc., No. 2024-1177 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2025) the Federal Circuit reversed a lower court grant of a motion to dismiss and held that claims for adjustable dumbbells were not ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Oil States Q&A: Are There Any Changes You Foresee Based On Oil States?

    We believe there will be an uptick in IPR filings in the near term.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Oil States Q&A: How Will These Other Constitutional Concerns Affect IPRs?

    Oil States addressed constitutionality under Article III and the Seventh Amendment, but it did not directly address the other takings and due process issues raised by the Justices.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Omega Patents Showcases The Need To Specifically Identify Prior Art And The Bases Of Willful Infringement

    In Omega Patents, LLC v. CalAmp Corporation, No. 2018-1309 (Fed. Cir. April 8, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed a finding that the asserted claims of four patents are not invalid,
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    One Deleted Term, One Case Lost

    In DDR Holdings, LLC v. Priceline.com LLC, No. 2023-1176 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2024), the Federal Circuit affirmed a judgment of non-infringement.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Oral Proceedings In G 1/24 – Claim Interpretation At The EPO

    Today saw the eagerly awaited Oral Proceedings before the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal in the case G 1/24, which relates to the extent to which the description may be used to interpret the claims in Europe.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Overcoming Obviousness Rejections By Attacking The Prima Facie Case

    This practice note teaches patent prosecutors how to overcome a patent examiner's obviousness rejection by attacking the examiner's prima facie case.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Parkinson's Patent Invalid Based On Obviousness Of Overlapping Ranges

    In UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., No. 2021-1924 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed a District of Delaware decision of invalidity based on obviousness.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 881–900 of 4415 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics