Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,415 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction Based On Erroneous Construction Of "Composition"

    In FMC Corp. v. Sharda USA, LLC, No. 2024-2335 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction and remanded because the district court abused its discretion due to an erroneous construction of the claim term "composition."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction, Finding Patent Infringement Claims Were Not Objectively Unreasonable

    In Lite-Netics, LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC, No. 2023-1146 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17, 2023), the Federal Circuit vacated a District of Nebraska decision granting Nu Tsai Capital's (d/b/a Holiday Bright Lights)...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement Based On Claim Construction That Erroneously Imported Embodiments Into The Claim

    In IQRIS Technologies LLC v. Point Blank Enterprises, Inc, No. 2023-2062 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 7, 2025), the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Warns Against Conclusory Expert Testimony

    The Federal Circuit warned against relying on conclusory expert testimony in TQ Delta, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc., Nos. 2018-1766, 2018-1767 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 22, 2019).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Five Most Popular Posts From 2018

    Happy New Year! We thought we'd take a quick look back at our most popular posts from 2018.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Framed As A Technological Improvement, Camera Patent Survives

    In Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., No. 22-1654 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 9, 2024), the Federal Circuit reversed summary judgment that Contour's patent was ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Generic Claim Terms And Broad Specification Led To No CBM Review

    The Board refused to institute a covered business method (CBM) review because the Petitioner failed to show that the patent at issue qualified to be a covered business method patent.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Georgia Ruling: End Of The Public-Private Partnership?

    In his dissent to the U.S. Supreme Court's Georgia v Public.Resource.Org decision in April, Justice Clarence Thomas cautioned that invalidating Georgia's copyright in state code annotations will seriously "shock" the public-private legal.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    How Digital Health Startups Can Leverage Intellectual Property

    One of the fastest growing segments of startups is digital health startups, creating cutting-edge innovations that improve the management and operations of hospitals and clinical practices, and the effectiveness of patient care.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    How Patent Clearance Strategy Might Change Post-Halo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's June 2016 decision in Halo Electronics v. Pulse Electronics, No. 14-1513, made it easier for courts to enhance damages for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    How To Earn Protection For Trade Secrets

    Robert Yoches and Michelle Rice of Finnegan explore some of the recent requirements laid down by US courts.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Ideas Not Rising To The Level Of Protectable IP Do Not Trigger An Obligation To Assign

    In Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. ITC, No. 2020-1785, (Apr. 29, 2021), the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's decision that Bio-Rad infringed three patents owned by 10X Genomics by importing...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    In Sig Sauer, Patent Owner Weaponizes Non-Infringement Declaratory Judgement Claims To Deny Institution

    In Sig Sauer Inc. v. Lone Star Future Weapons Inc., IPR2025-00410, Paper 13 (PTAB June 26, 2025), Acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart (Acting Director) exercised discretion...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Infringement Enforcement Letters Can Subject Sender To DJ Jurisdiction And Venue

    In Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., et al. v. Plano Encryption Technologies LLC, 2016-2700 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2018), the Court reversed and remanded the district court and held that infringement enforcement letters sufficed to establish personal jurisdiction, and therefore venue, in a declaratory judgment (DJ) action.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Ingenico: Federal Circuit Clarifies Only "Grounds," Not The Prior Art They Rely On, Are Estopped After An IPR

    With the recent discretionary denial changes at the PTAB, one point of emphasis has been petitioner's stipulations not to pursue certain grounds or references in the parallel district court litigation...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Injunctions In Trademark Cases Must Take Into Account Totality Of The Circumstances

    Can a U.S. trademark owner sue a foreign defendant for trademark infringement where the defendant has only intended to use the allegedly infringing mark in the U.S.?
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Innovation Liberation

    Despite Covid-19, patent filings during the first three months of the pandemic actually increased in the US.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Intent For Induced Infringement Is Not Negated By The Board's Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable As Obvious

    In United Therapeutics Corp. v. Liquidia Techs., Inc., No. 22-2217, the Federal Circuit affirmed a District of Delaware decision addressing claim construction, validity, and infringement.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Inventorship & The AIA: The Federal Circuit's First Derivation Decision - Part 1 (Podcast)

    In this special two-episode podcast series, Finnegan partner Jeffrey Totten chats with Finnegan attorney Alissa Green about the Federal Circuit's inaugural ruling...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    IP Issues In IoT Standardization For The Semiconductor Industry: Will The Honeymoon Last?

    Semiconductor companies have long recognized the potential for the Internet of Things (IoT).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 861–880 of 4415 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics