4,413 results found

In In re: Bayou Grande Coffee Roasting Co., No. 24-1118 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2025), the Federal Circuit reversed the TTAB's determination that use of the mark "KAHWA" for identifying...

In In re Vivint, Inc., No. 20-1992 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 29, 2021), the Federal Circuit vacated a PTAB decision upholding an examiner's rejection of all claims in Vivint's patent following ex parte reexamination.

In MLC Intellectual Property, LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc., No. 2020-1413 (August 26, 2021), the Federal Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California's...

Most U.S. trademark practitioners are aware that Section 37 of the Lanham Act gives district courts the power to cancel a trademark registration.

In Myco Industries, Inc. v. BlephEx, LLC, No. 2019-2374 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2020), the Federal Circuit reversed, vacated...

In In re Rudy, No. 2019-2301 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 24, 2020), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's ruling finding Rudy's fish hook invention ineligible for patenting under § 101.

In Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc., Nos. 2019-1067 and 2019-1102 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of the parties' motions for JMOL or alternative...

In Amdoc (Israel) Ltd. v. Openet Telecom, Inc., No. 15-1180 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2016), a split panel of the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's finding that . . .

Government contracts often require the contractor to indemnify the United States for damages related to a patent infringement suit.

In this article Finnegan partner, Lawrence R. Robins, analyzes Barclays Capital Inc. v. THEFLYONTHEWALL.COM decision and discusses the implications for newspapers in protecting the value of their newsgathering.

Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, due to go into effect in December 2015, will change the scope of discovery, the timing of document requests, and the rules for responding to document requests.

In Enplas Display Device Corp. v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, No. 16-2599 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 19, 2018), the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the jury's $4 million damages award ...

You might be riding to work in a driverless car without ever having to look up from your text messages.

Since the enactment of the America Invents Act (AIA) in 2011, U.S. patent law has undergone a period of transition.

Finnegan attorneys John F. Hornick and Carlos J. Rosario address issues relating to: "The recently reported patent spat between two 3D printing startups offers some insight for businesses about IP rights.

In Henny Penny Corp. v. Frymaster LLC, No. 2018-1596 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 12, 2019), the Federal Circuit held the Board did not abuse its discretion in rejecting a petitioner's obviousness theory ...

Inter partes review (IPR) is the most popular post-grant proceeding established by the America Invents Act of 2011.

In Zircon Corp. v. ITC, No. 2022-1649 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2024), the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's finding that Zircon failed to satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement of § 337.