Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,412 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    August 2020 - Last Month At The Federal Circuit Podcast Series

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit – a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Boilerplate Language In Specification Does Not Support Written Description To Undescribed Modifications

    In D Three Enterprises, LLC v. Sunmodo Corp., Nos. 2017-1909, -1910 (Fed. Cir. May 21, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment determination that the asserted claims...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms Disclosure Of Parent Genus Does Not Invalidate Species Claims In UCB v. Accord Healthcare

    In UCB, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., Nos. 16-2610, 16-2683, 16-2685, 16-2698, 16-2710, 17-1001 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2018), the CAFC affirmed the district court's holding that the asserted claims...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms District Court Decision Finding Unclean Hands In Gilead V. Merck

    In Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Merck & Co. Inc., Nos. 16-2302, 16-2615 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 25, 2018), the CAFC affirmed the district court's finding that misconduct attributable to Merck barred it ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms Joined IPR Petitioners Have Standing For Appellate Review In Mylan v. RCT

    In Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Research Corporation Technologies, Inc., the CAFC held that appellants, who had joined the IPR proceeding below under 35 U.S.C. § 315, had standing to appeal but affirmed that ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms No Interference-In-Fact In University Of California V. Broad Institute

    In University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc., No. 2017-1907 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2018), the CAFC affirmed the PTAB's holding that there was no interference-in-fact between a pending University
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms PTAB's Obviousness Decision Did Not Deviate From Petition In Sirona Dental v. Institut Straumann

    In Sirona Dental Systems GmbH v. Institut Straumann AG, Nos. 17-1341, 17-1403 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2018), the CAFC affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded-in-part the ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms PTAB's Priority Determination In Natural Alternatives v. Iancu

    In Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Iancu., No. 2017-1962 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 1, 2018), the CAFC affirmed the PTAB's priority determination invalidating Natural Alternative's patent directed to a human dietary supplement that increases the anaerobic working capacity of muscle and other tissues.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms Public Use And On-Sale Bars Only Apply Where The Invention Is Ready For Patenting In Divided Opinion In Barry v. Medtronic

    In Barry v. Medtronic, Inc., No. 17-2463 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2019), the CAFC majority affirmed the district court's findings that Dr. Barry's system and method claims were not invalid
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Clarifies PTA After Interference In Mayo v. Iancu

    In Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. Iancu, No. 2018-2031 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision that Patent Term Adjustment is ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Dismissed For Lack Of Standing After Abandoning Product Development In Momenta v. BMS

    In Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., No. 17-1694 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2019), the CAFC dismissed Momenta's appeal from a final written decision of the PTAB for lack of standing.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Holds That Request To PTAB Adjudication Waives Constitutionality Challenge

    The Federal Circuit denied Ciena Corporation's motion to vacate the PTAB's final written decision and remand for further proceedings consistent with Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Remands For Further Fact-Finding On Public Accessibility Of A Video And Presentation Asserted As Prior Art

    Medtronic appealed PTAB decisions in two IPR proceedings upholding all challenged claims directed to pedicle screws for spinal derotation surgery.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Remands For Further Fact-Finding On Public Accessibility Of A Video And Presentation Asserted As Prior Art In Medtronic v. Barry

    In Medtronic, Inc. v. Barry, Nos. 17-1169, 17-1170 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2018), the CAFC vacated the PTAB's conclusion that a video and presentation describing techniques for spinal derotation surgery...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Reverses PTAB's Obviousness Ruling In OSI v. Apotex

    In OSI Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Apotex Inc., No. 2018-1925 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2019), the CAFC reversed the PTAB's conclusion that a reasonable factfinder could conclude a person of ordinary skill...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    CAFC Upholds No Same-Party Or New Issue Joinder For IPRs At The PTAB

    In Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, the Federal Circuit denied Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc but granted their petition for panel rehearing in order to withdraw and replace the original March 18, 2020 opinion.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Characterization Of Reference As Primary Or Secondary Has No Effect On The Obviousness Analysis

    In Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc., No. 22-1333 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("Board") holding that all claims of U.S. Patent Nos. RE41,623, 7,754,042, and 7,766,475 and claims 1–6, 8–21, and 24–31 of U.S. Patent No. 7,749,581.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Claim Language "Lofty . . . Batting" Found Not Invalid On Indefiniteness And Anticipation Grounds

    In Guangdong Alison Hi-Tech Co. v. International Trade Commission, No. 2018-2042 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's findings that the claims of U.S.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Claims That Are Entirely Functional In Nature Are Not Patent-Eligible Under Mayo/Alice

    The Court rejected the purported novelty of using a downloadable application, reasoning that the application in substance was described functionally...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Collateral Estoppel May Bar Patentability Of Substitute Claims In An IPR

    In ZyXEL Communications Corp. v. UNM Rainforest Innovations, No. 22-2220 (Fed. Cir. July 22, 2024), the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, and remanded...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 481–500 of 4412 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics