Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,411 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    3D Printing Companies Petition The Supreme Court For Copyright Clarity

    Many people believe 3D printing will disrupt IP law as it becomes mainstream. Now, three companies are petitioning the highest court in the U.S. to create a new test to delineate what types of objects can be copyrighted.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    5 Distinctions Between IPRs And District Court Patent Litigation

    Over 3,600 petitions for inter partes review (IPR) have been filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) since this post-grant procedure became available in 2012.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    A Business Growth Tool: Patent Claiming Strategies

    Developing a pharmaceutical product can take on the order of a decade from research (first inventing the drug) to development, and finally to FDA approval.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Podcast

    A Conversation With Vaishali Udupa, Commissioner For Patents Of The USPTO (Podcast)

    In this podcast, Esther Lim, partner and Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer at Finnegan chats with the Commissioner for Patents of the United States Patent and Trademark Office...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    A Decade Under The America Invents Act (AIA)

    All the effective dates of the America Invents Act ("AIA") have come and gone.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    A Letter In Response To A Request For Quotation Constitutes An Offer For Sale

    In Junker v. Medical Components, Inc., No. 2021-1649 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2022), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's summary judgment of no on-sale bar.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    A Petitioner Cannot Assert Discovery Of Invalidating Prior Art After The ITC Issued A General Exclusion Order

    In Mayborn Group, Ltd. v. ITC, No. 2019-2077 (Fed. Cir. July 16, 2020), the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's denial of Mayborn's petition for rescission of a general exclusion order ("GEO")...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    A Preamble Held Limiting Based On The Patentee's Arguments In A Prior Appeal And File History

    In Data Engine Techs. LLC, v. Google LLC, No. 21-1050 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 26, 2021), the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's summary judgment of noninfringement premised on the construction of a term in the preamble.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Acting Director Gives Guidance On How To Argue "Settled Expectations" Exist For Young Patents

    In Amgen Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, IPR2025-00603, Paper 8 (PTAB Jul. 24, 2025), the Acting USPTO Director Coke Morgan Stewart denied institution...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    AI Divergence: Why Germany And The UK Are On Different Paths

    Recent court decisions by the UK High Court and Germany's Munich Regional Court reveal differing approaches to copyright law in the context of generative AI and "memorisation."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:The First Successful Defense Of Orange Book Listed Patents

    This article discusses the PTAB IPR proceedings for the challenged patents, specifically the '740 patent.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    An Exceptional Case Means Just That

    The Federal Circuit in Stone Basket Innovations, LLC v. Cook Medical LLC affirmed the district court, holding that the case was not exceptional.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Analysing Arthrex

    In November 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled that the appointment of administrative patent judges by the Secretary of Commerce was unconstitutional.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Analyzing The PTAB In The First Half Of 2016

    All post-grant proceedings at the USPTO start with the filing of a petition and progress through two general phases—a pre-institution phase and a post-institution phase.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Appeals Court Rules On The Transmission Of 3D Files

    In a case with important implications for 3D printing, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in a dispute between tooth aligner competitors Align and ClearCorrect...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Applicants' Statements During Prosecution Streamlines Scope Of Claims For Multimedia Streaming Patent

    In Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, No. 2021-1998 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2022), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's claim construction...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Applying Standard Techniques In A Standard Way To Observe Natural Phenomena Is Not Patent-Eligible

    In CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., No. 2022-1027 (Fed. Cir. July 18, 2022), the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that CareDx's three patents were invalid for claiming patent-ineligible subject matter.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Artificial Intelligence Ineligible For Inventorship

    In Thaler v. Vidal, No. 21-2347 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2022), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment because an "inventor" must be a natural person.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Assessing Patent Value: Software Inventions

    Ever since the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l last year, the value of software inventions in the U.S. has been challenging to assess.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Assignor Estoppel Has "No Place" In IPR Proceedings

    Assignor estoppel is an equitable defense that prevents an assignor of a patent from later challenging the patent's validity.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 461–480 of 4411 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics