Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,149 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Australian best method requirement in patent specifications bares its teeth again!

    Attorneys drafting patent specifications for prosecution in Australia, must understand the best method requirements.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Brexit: European trade marks – possibility of no deal

    Some guidance on how trade mark rights will be affected if a deal is not reached between the UK and the EU.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Article

Changes to ACCC guidelines: Get your intellectual property contracts compliant now

Article advises that the ACCC guidelines will be required reading for anyone involved in IP licensing in Australia.
AustraliaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Changes to .au domain name rules – implications for Australian trade mark owners

    The new rules introduce several changes to the previous eligibility rules applying to .au domain names.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Diagnostic methods in Australia

    Recent FC decision confirms that diagnostic methods are patentable subject-matter in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Disclose the best method of performing your invention or face the prospect of patent revocation

    This decision puts Australian patentees on notice to include the best method known to them of performing an invention.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Does the law recognise the 'confidential information' contained in a database?

    The right to enforce a duty of confidence is recognised in major common law jurisdictions with similar pre-conditions.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Full Court Gives Pro-Patent Verdict

    In a recent decision, the Full Federal Court presided over the next instalment in the long running dispute between Stena and Austal Ships regarding multi-hulled vessels.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Genesis Of Confusion In Business Method Patents Decision

    On 18 July, 2006, the full court of the Australian Federal Court, in Grant v. Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFC 120 made a significant pronouncement likely to add substantial confusion to the borders of possible business method patent protection in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Hop aboard the bullet train to Japanese patent numbering

    Article provides guidance of the Japanese patent numbering system & what you need in order to locate older Japanese publications.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    How can design registration help stop online sales of counterfeit products?

    Registered designs in your IP portfolio could challenge a counterfeiter who may simply produce an imitation product.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Howden Australia Pty Ltd v Minetek Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 981: alleged breach of confidential information

    There was no evidence that the plaintiff had taken information with him when he left the first applicant's employment.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Increasing Recognition Of "Green" Technologies In The World Of Intellectual Property

    "Green technologies" – those that provide an environmental benefit, or in some cases lessen a detriment, are assuming ever-increasing status throughout the world. This is especially true in Australia, where the recently-formed Government was only established after the Labour Party reached a formal agreement with the Greens.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Israel Acknowledges Importance of Software Patents

    The Israeli Patent Office had previously adopted a restrictive standard in relation to computer implemented technologies.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    LION: Film titles a sign of artistic origin but not a trade mark

    A recent Australian Trade Marks Office decision has confirmed that the name of a film is not a trade mark.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Lonsdale Australia Limited v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd & Anor [2012] FCA 584

    Importers bear the onus of proof when a registrant of a trademark claims to have consented to the use of the trademark.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Name of tomato variety can be registered as trademark

    Mastronardi Produce Limited has succeeded in an appeal that refused registration of the trademark ZIMA for tomatoes.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New Zealand trademark update: Another failed opposition for Barossa Valley Estate Pty Ltd

    Trade mark may proceed to registration albeit with a disclaimer recorded against it.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New Zealand - What Does "Local Novelty" Really Mean?

    New Zealand is one of the few developed countries that retains a "local novelty" provision in its patents legislation. When assessing the patentability of an application, local novelty disregards any publication or use outside that particular jurisdiction. This, in theory, allows patent applicants to file in New Zealand after overseas publication, use, sale, or even the expiry of the 12-month Paris Convention period.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    No more Notices of Entitlement for patent applications before acceptance

    Recent changes remove the requirement to lodge a Notice of Entitlement for patent applications prior to acceptance.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Showing 361–380 of 1149 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics