9,768 results found

On May 10, 2021, the SEC's Office of the Whistleblower announced multi-million dollar awards to two whistleblowers who provided the SEC with information that assisted the agency in bringing...

The Seventh Circuit applied ordinary contract law interpretation principles and concluded that the agreement "unambiguously" provided the retirees with vested healthcare benefits.

In Adams v. General Motors Company (Case No. 12-2084), the Sixth Circuit rejected an ineligible retiree’s claim for reinstatement of erroneous benefit payments under her former employer’s pension plan.

On December 16, 2015, the House of Representatives struck a tentative deal on an appropriations bill that would fund the federal government through the 2016 fiscal year.

Following passage of AB-5, the recent string of multi-million dollar employee jury verdicts, and other challenging developments

It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court will grant Digital Realty's request to address this incredibly divisive issue.

Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman, alleged under Title VII that she had been denied a management promotion and demoted based on her sexual orientation.

Dan Popescu sued Apple Inc. for damages after he was fired by his employer, Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC.

What legal changes has #MeToo brought to life?

The Third Circuit held that the catalyst theory of recovery applies to ERISA cases when determining whether to award attorneys' fees.

The Third Circuit recently held that anti-assignment clauses in ERISA-governed healthcare plans are enforceable as long as they are unambiguous.

California businesses that have 50 or more employees are already required to train supervisors on legally prohibited sexual harassment.

In this opinion, the California Supreme Court answered a question certified to it by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

After two mediation sessions, the parties moved for approval of a settlement agreement, but the trial court declined to approve the settlement because the release was too broad.

The putative class members in this case moved for class certification on the theory that although Walgreens's stated policy on meal breaks was proper, its actual practice departed from its stated policy...

On February 17, 2017, a federal district Court in Kansas upheld the U.S. Department of Labor's conflict of interest rule and related exemptions in a suit brought by Market Synergy Group, Inc.

Harold Bain sued Tax Reducers, Inc. for unpaid minimum wages, expenses and waiting time penalties.