On October 7, 2025, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Chiles v. Salazar, a case that tests the extent of First Amendment protections for regulated professionals.

New compliance requirements are coming: Texas agencies will soon roll out stricter rules on age verification, labeling, and retailer obligations

The DOJ has revised its Corporate Enforcement Policy to offer more certainty and stronger incentives for companies that voluntarily...

The U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392 (June 24, 2022), overruling Roe v. Wade, raised more questions than answers for U.S.

The ordinance seeks to combat workplace misconduct in Chicago and may serve as a model for other municipalities seeking to expand worker protections.

The Sixth Circuit's recent decision in Bruce v. Adams & Reese, LLP (No. 25-5210) provides critical guidance on the application of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021 (EFAA).

The Supreme Court heard argument in Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (No. 24-783), a case that presents a deceptively narrow procedural question with potentially significant consequences for federal jurisdiction...

In Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining,the Supreme Court is weighing whether legal challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) denial of Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) exemptions for small oil refineries must be filed exclusively in the D.C. Circuit under the Clean Air Act (CAA).

In a 6-2 decision authored by Justice Thomas, the Supreme Court held in consolidated cases Oklahoma v. EPA and PacifiCorp v. EPA that the Environmental Protection Agency...

SB 951 significantly limits MSO ownership and control in medical practices.

The Supreme Court granted review of President Trump's Executive Order No. 14160, addressing the application of birthright citizenship.

Happy New Year from Dykema's Appellate and Critical Motions Practice! Last Month at the Supreme Court is kicking off the new year with a bang by diving into Trump v. Slaughter...

In Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist (No. 24-724), the Supreme Court will determine (1) whether a district court's judgment resolving litigation between completely diverse parties must later be vacated...

On May 15, 2025, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on three related emergency applications—Trump v. CASA, Inc.(No. 24A884); Trump v. Washington (No. 24A885)...

In Pung v. Isabella County (No. 25-95), the Supreme Court is considering whether the Takings Clause requires governments to compensate property owners based on the fair market value of their property...

The Supreme Court is currently considering a procedural question that could significantly affect how appeals are handled when litigants miss filing deadlines due to delayed notice of judgment.

The dispute, Consumers' Research v. FCC, centers on Congress's 1996 directive to the FCC to expand access to telecommunications services nationwide.

We're not playing horseshoes here, folks. It's time to review your consumer privacy rights forms and mechanisms.

A federal court ruled the president does not have the power to use IEEPA to impose sweeping tariffs that do not directly address the declared emergency...

The Court will consider whether Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act, which limits participation in female athletic teams to biological females, violates the Equal Protection Clause and Title IX.