2,033 results found

Earlier this week, Privacy Law 360 ran my most comprehensive analysis on the warrantless cell tower data debate, to date.

A discussion on preserving the attorney client privilege.

The Privilege Of Being An Attorney.

On April 8, in a claim that arose out of the leakage of patients' private health information, a California district court prevented a national health care organization from accessing plaintiffs' computer systems...

Companies face a myriad of issues as a result of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.

Although such subpoenas are common in white-collar investigations, they present daunting tasks for companies that are unfamiliar with federal criminal or regulatory inquiries.

In Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Co., a California federal district court permitted HP to bring counterclaims against the lead plaintiff in a wage and hour class action.

In a closely watched decision that will undoubtedly impact both public and private employers, the Supreme Court of the United States recently held, in "City of Ontario, California v. Quon", that the City of Ontario's review of a police officer's text messages transmitted on a City-issued device were reasonable and did not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Court Denies BofA's Motion to Reconsider Use of FHFA Documents Produced in Other RMBS Litigation.

As companies prepare for potential congressional scrutiny in the next Congress, recent legal developments have created a complex landscape where oversight targets may find themselves caught between congressional demands and White House confidentiality concerns.

The Superior Court in Villare v. Beebe Medical Center Inc. held that the Plaintiff was unable to prove damages because he lacked a sufficient evidence.

A book review by Claudio Salas of Attorney-Client Privilege in International Arbitration, published by the Journal of International Arbitration.

As we celebrate the 11th annual World eDiscovery Day, members of our e-DAT practice group reflect on nearly three decades as pioneers in eDiscovery innovation and client service.

The court extended and applied Rule 26(b) proportionality to the issue of ESI preservation, and gave dispositive weight to the plaintiff's sample-based review of the contents of the devices.

This Jones Day White Paper examines Rule 37(e) cases decided over the past year and explains why proper litigation holds are the first step for minimizing the risk of sanctions.

In the recent bench ruling entered in Harrison v. Quivus Systems LLC, C.A. 12084-VCMR (April 7, 2016), Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves ruled that discovery into the reasonableness of fees sought in an advancement case will be postponed until after the Court first determines that plaintiff has established a right to advancement.

Now that you've likely had your fill of turkey sandwiches, turkey salad, turkey soup and the like, there is a new development on which to focus.