34,884 results found

Safeway Wage & Hour Cases, 2019 WL 6954322 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)

The plaintiffs await a decision from the United States Supreme Court on whether it will review the D.C. Circuit's decision.

The panel explained that because the wage orders regulate basic working conditions, they warrant the broadest definition of employment to the widest group of workers.

After a former Best Buy employee filed a putative class action alleging misclassification of store managers as exempt, his attorney collected contact information for all putative class members...

Welcome to Decoding Appeals, where Seyfarth's Appellate Team brings you insights and expertise from the front lines of the courtroom.

Welcome to Decoding Appeals, where Seyfarth's Appellate Team brings to in-house counsel our insights and expertise from the front lines of the appellate courts.

The Second Circuit held that the owner of a contributing employer to multiemployer benefit plans breached his fiduciary duties by failing to make required contributions and was thus personally liable for the delinquencies, interest, and attorneys’ fees.

Wilfert Williams sued the Sacramento River Cats Baseball Club under a common law tort action for allegedly failing to hire him as an assistant visitor clubhouse manager because of his race.

This is the second such lawsuit against a restaurant franchise filed in the same court.

Continuing a trend in other Circuits, the Eighth Circuit held that a service provider that was contracted to provide the 401(k) plan's investment options does not act as an ERISA fiduciary...

Cecilia Diego sued her former employer for retaliation in violation of public policy that resulted from the director's mistaken belief that Diego had lodged a complaint with the California Department of Social Services...

The arbitration agreement in Capili contained several substantially unconscionable provisions—including a forum selection clause that designated Indiana as the forum for disputes for California employees...

Elvia Velasco Jimenez asserted claims under the FEHA against her "contracting employer," a manufacturing company named U.S. Continental Marketing Inc. ("USCM")

In this case, the whistleblower had contacted OSHA in 2012 to complain about workplace safety issues.

In E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Cabrera, the Supreme Court unanimously held that a preponderance of the evidence standard applies when an employer must demonstrate...

In the fifth episode of the Employment Law Legends podcast series, Paul Rinnan examines the legal battle surrounding...

Counsel Sarah Bell will be speaking at the NYC Bar Association's CLE program titled "Every Contract is a Litigation Waiting to Happen."

Lloyds of London provided the employer in this case with an employment practices liability insurance ("EPLI") policy, which contained an exclusion relating to "wage and hour or overtime law(s)."