Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

984 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    NAFTA To United States-Mexico Trade Agreement To...?

    The US thereafter will proceed to ratification/implementation by Congress, which will not occur until after the next Congress is seated in 2019.
    United StatesInternational Law
    Dickinson Wright PLLC
    Dickinson Wright PLLC
  • Article

    Not So Fast! Qualcomm Cannot Use "Curious Quirk" Of U.S. Discovery Law In Korean Antitrust Proceeding

    A recent federal court order highlights the scope, and the limitations, of a U.S. court's authority to order domestic discovery for use in a foreign proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1782.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Docket Report - June 28, 2016

    Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in four cases of interest to the business community: Federal Jurisdiction—Fannie Mae; Bankruptcy Code—Structured Dismissals; Sherman Act—Conspiracy by Members of a Business Association; Fair Housing Act—Standing
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Mayer Brown
    Mayer Brown
  • Article

    California Supreme Court Bars Pass-on Defense for State Law Antitrust Claims

    On 12 July 2010, the California Supreme Court in Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc., No. S166435, 2010 WL 2721021 (Cal. July 12, 2010), held that California law bars antitrust defendants from invoking a pass-on defense in most circumstances even though both direct and indirect purchasers may sue for treble damages.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Hogan Lovells US LLP
    Hogan Lovells US LLP
  • Article

    Ninth Circuit Limits Forum Shopping Against E-Commerce Platforms

    On November 29, 2023, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision in Briskin v. Shopify, limiting the court's jurisdictional reach against e-commerce...
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Fenwick
    Fenwick
  • Article

    Health Antitrust Advisory: Federal Trade Commission Rules Evanston Northwestern Merger Violated Antitrust Law

    The federal antitrust enforcement agencies have lost more than a half-dozen merger cases in the courts over the last decade.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    Competition Agencies In The United States And Europe Publish Revised Best Practices On Cooperation In Merger Investigations

    Marking the 20th anniversary of the cooperation agreement between the United States and the European Union regarding the application of their competition laws, the US and EU antitrust/competition agencies have published a revised set of Best Practices on Cooperation in Merger Investigations ("Best Practices").
    GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law
    Mayer Brown
    Mayer Brown
  • Article

    Newly Enacted Law Targeting Russia Creates Novel Tariff Authority Over Third-Country Imports, While Reinforcing Existing U.S. Sanctions Framework

    President Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, introducing unprecedented tariff authority that could impose duties up to 100% on goods from countries purchasing Russian energy or facilitating sanctions evasion. The legislation creates a novel framework where tariffs stack on top of existing duties while codifying Russia sanctions into statute...
    GlobalInternational Law
    Akin
    Akin
  • Article

    Federal Trade Commission Issues New 6(b) Orders For An Up-Close And Personal Review Of Personalized Pricing Practices

    The Federal Trade Commission has issued Section 6(b) orders to nine major companies, demanding detailed information about their use of personal data in setting individualized prices for consumers and compensation for workers. This investigation marks a significant expansion of the FTC's scrutiny into personalized pricing practices, examining how companies leverage consumer data such as income, household composition, and shopping behavior to determine targeted pricing and worker pay rates.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Sheppard
    Sheppard
  • Article

    More Aggressive Antitrust Enforcement Ahead

    Setting the tone for more vigorous antitrust enforcement in the Obama administration, especially with respect to unilateral conduct of market-leading firms, on May 11, 2009, Christine Varney delivered her first public remarks as the new Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust ("Varney" or "AAG Varney").
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Duane Morris LLP
    Duane Morris LLP
  • Article

    Are You Acquiring Voting Securities With Investment Intent? It Depends On Who's Asking

    The DOJ alleged that this intention disqualified ValueAct from relying on the "investment" exemption.
    United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
    Arnold & Porter
    Arnold & Porter
  • Article

    U.S. Supreme Court Ends "Per Se" Illegality Of Minimum Resale Price Holders Of Maintenance Agreements, Manufacturers And Licensors Should Have Cautious Optimism

    Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.</I>, 551 U.S. ___ (2007), the U.S. Supreme Court made it easier for manufacturers and licensors to set the minimum price at which their goods can be sold. This practice, commonly known as minimum resale price maintenance ("RPM") had long been considered per se (automatically) illegal under a nearly century-old line of court decisions.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Goodwin Procter LLP
    Goodwin Procter LLP
  • Article

    European Commission Adopts New Leniency Framework

    On December 7, 2006, the European Commission adopted a new Leniency Notice that sets out the framework for granting immunity and reducing fines in cartel cases. The new notice replaces the Commission’s 2002 notice.
    European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law
    Morrison Foerster
    Morrison Foerster
  • Article

    American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League – Is Every League or Association a "Walking Conspiracy" for Purposes of Antitrust Analysis?

    The United States Supreme Court concluded earlier this week that the National Football League ("NFL") is not a single business, but rather is 32 separate entities.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Ninth Circuit Adopts Clear Cost-Based Standards to Evaluate Antitrust Liability of "Bundled Discounts"

    On September 4, 2007, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Cascade Health Solutions (f/k/a McKenzie-Willamette Hospital) v. PeaceHealth1, ruling that bundled discounts violate antitrust law only if the discounts results in below-cost pricing.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • Article

    Ninth Circuit Issues Important Decision On Bundled Discounts in PeaceHealth

    On September 4, 2007, the Ninth Circuit issued an important decision concerning the antitrust treatment of "bundled discounts," the common practice of providing greater discounts in exchange for purchasing a range of products or services.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Mayer Brown
    Mayer Brown
  • Article

    Two UPC Resellers Settle FTC Invitation To Collude Investigation

    On July 28, 2014, the Federal Trade Commission accepted, subject to final approval, settlements with InstantUPCCodes.com and Nationwide Barcode.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Sheppard
    Sheppard
  • Article

    Federal Trade Commission Releases Long-Awaited Report On Patent Assertion Entities

    The FTC's PAE Report follows a number of previous policy statements involving intellectual property.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    Federal Trade Commission Takes Jurisdiction Of Intellectual Property Practices Without Charging Antitrust Violation

    On January 23, 2008, the Federal Trade Commission announced a stipulated settlement with Negotiated Data Solutions LLC (N-Data) curtailing N-Data's efforts to license its patents relating to Ethernet, an almost universally used computer networking standard, on terms different than those that had been promised before the standard was adopted.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Foley & Lardner LLP
  • Article

    Proposed U.S. Patent Office Rule Changes Could Significantly Affect Portfolio Development

    Earlier this year, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) proposed a series of new rules to streamline the examination of patent applications. If adopted in their current form, the rules will significantly affect how applicants develop their patent portfolios. At the moment, it is unclear what the final rules will be. Furthermore, the USPTO has not specified when the new rules will go into effect, but has indicated that at least 30 days’ advance notice will be given.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Goodwin Procter LLP
    Goodwin Procter LLP
  • Showing 741–760 of 984 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics