8,398 results found

Last Friday, Snapchat (which recently changed its name to Snap, Inc.) announced the coming release of its newest product:

Social media privacy cases continue to grow under the Stored Communications Act ("SCA") (see our prior alert on the Ehling decision).

In Long v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation, the named plaintiffs applied for positions as bus operators with the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA").

Subway is one of the largest franchisors in the world, with over 26,000 restaurants in the United States alone.

Employer Solutions Staffing Group ("ESSG") contracts with other companies to recruit employees and place them at jobsites for which ESSG provides administrative tasks such as payroll processing.

On August 2, 2017, a federal judge ruled that supervisors and managers can use their subordinates as "comparators" for lodging workplace discrimination suits against their employers.

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued its much-anticipated opinion on whether pharmaceutical sales representatives can properly be treated as exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standard Act’s "outside salesman" exemption.

In the second split decision since the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court gave organized labor a status quo victory in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association on Tuesday.

The Supreme Court recently held in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar that a plaintiff alleging unlawful retaliation under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act must prove that the plaintiff's protected conduct was the "but-for" cause of the employer's adverse action.

Almost 40 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education ruled that states could require public employees to pay union dues.

In Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion, clarified the its opinion in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer,...

The Supreme Court of the United States ruled today that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ("Title VII"), protects third party employees from retaliation in addition to the person bringing the original complaint.

Suhaill Morales’ article "Supreme Court Ruling Unclear Whether Employers Must Provide Light Duty to Pregnant Employees" was featured in Daily Business Review on April 14, 2015.

Although some would argue that the next U.S. Supreme Court term is not shaping up to be as monumental as the last term, employers should have their eye on the recent decision of the Court to hear United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.

On March 22, 2016, the Supreme Court upheld a $5.8 million judgment against Tyson Foods in a pay dispute between the company and more than 3,000 workers.

In a recent case, the New Jersey Superior Court decided that an employer's policy prohibiting employees from wearing henna tattoos on their hands while at work may amount to discriminatory interference with the exercise of employees' religious beliefs.

This decision will now be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and could set the stage for an eventual showdown in the U.S. Supreme Court.

As the EEOC's fiscal year wound down as of September 30th, the Commission filed a slew of lawsuits.