Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

34,884 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Judge Andrews Issues Markman Opinion In InterDigital Action Construing Four Disputed Terms In Patents-In-Suit

    By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in InterDigital Communications, Inc., et al. v. ZTE Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 13-00009-RGA, the Court rendered its Markman Opinion...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Judge Robinson Grants Plaintiffs' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Of Invalidity Finding Patent Claim Indefinite

    In reaching its conclusion, the Court found that "the claim language and the specification do not provide structural limitations for the 'processing system'...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Judge Stark Grants Motion In Limine In Part Precluding Defendant From Referring To Plaintiff As "Patent Troll" During Trial

    The Court granted Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures I LLC’s motion in limine seeking to preclude argument and evidence disparaging IV’s business model and practices.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    New Supreme Court Decision Expected To Influence Trademark Opposition Strategy

    A recent United States Supreme Court decision is likely to affect the way that parties approach trademark opposition proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Nike V. Adidas: The PTAB Can Sua Sponte Raise Arguments For Substitute Claims

    In Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") may sua sponte raise a new ground of unpatentability for substitute...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast Series: Last Month At The Federal Circuit - August 2019

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit–a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast Series: Last Month At The Federal Circuit - December 2018

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit impacting the intellectual property community
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast Series: Last Month At The Federal Circuit - July 2018

    In this podcast, Finnegan partners Beth Ferrill and Trenton Ward offer insight into the recently decided case Sirona Dental Systems v. Institut Straumann AG ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast Series: Last Month At The Federal Circuit - September 2018

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Admonishes Mohawk Tribe On Repeated Missteps

    Earlier this week I discussed the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe's discovery request directed to the Board's internal practices, personnel policies, and communications; yesterday, the Board responded.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Bar Association Is Open For Business

    The PTAB Bar Association is an organization dedicated to preserving and promoting the professional and ethical standards among those who appear before the PTAB.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    PTAB Denies Institution Of Kyle Bass IPRs - But Not For Improper Purpose

    The USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued it first institution decisions on IPR petitions filed by Kyle Bass and his Coalition for Affordable Drugs, denying institution of his challenges to two Orange-book listed patents for Ampyra.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Foley & Lardner LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Makes Dispositive Case Rulings Available Daily, PTAB Litigation Blog

    The PTAB has introduced a new page where case-dispositive rulings are posted on a daily basis.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    PTAB Proposes Amendments To Its Rules Of Practice

    The USPTO is soliciting comments on the proposed rule package until October 19, 2015.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Recent Decisions Shed Some Light On Scope Of AIA Estoppel

    When the America Invents Act legislation was first proposed, many thought its broad estoppel provisions might be a deterrent for parties considering post-grant proceedings.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Reply Evidence Sufficient To Establish Printed Publication Status Of Reference

    In doing so, the Federal Circuit explained that the PTAB properly considered evidence submitted by Twitter in its reply brief that was not previously submitted in Twitter's IPR petitions.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Rule 36 Affirms § 101 Invalidity, Sidesteps Party Challenge

    The Federal Circuit summarily affirmed a district court's invalidation of a wearable heart-rate monitor patent under Section 101, finding the claims directed to abstract mental processes of gathering information and performing calculations. Despite arguments about evidentiary support, the appellate court upheld the determination that the patent's unconventional ordering of steps failed to supply the inventive concept necessary for patent eligibility.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP
    Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP
  • Article

    September 2019 - Last Month At The Federal Circuit Podcast Series

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit, a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Sport Dimension, Inc. v. The Coleman Company, Inc., No. 2015-1553 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2016)

    The Coleman Company, Inc. appealed a stipulated judgment from the Central District of California, which found noninfringement of Coleman's design patent directed towards "the ornamental design for a personal flotation device."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Staying True To The Specification: Federal Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction Based On Unsupported Claim Constructions

    The Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction in a patent infringement case involving electrical outlet cover products, finding that the district court made critical errors in its claim construction analysis. The appellate court determined that the lower court improperly imposed unsupported limitations on key patent terms and incorrectly applied a presumption of irreparable harm.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 661–680 of 34884 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics