Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,201 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    "Do I Need A License To Make This Toy?"

    Successful toys are very often miniature recreations of persons or objects in the real world or from an entertainment property. Whether or not the toy maker needs permission (a license) to make that recreation depends on several factors.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
    Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
  • Article

    It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad, FRAND World

    When an invention claimed in a patent is essential to complying with a technical operating standard, it is considered a Standard Essential Patent, or SEP.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Morrison Foerster
    Morrison Foerster
Article

Kentucky In No State To Seize Domain Name

In 2008 the State of Kentucky, in the course of enforcing its criminal laws, sought penal forfeiture of the fulltiltpoker.com domain name on the basis that it had been used in the commission of multiple crimes within Kentucky. A seizure order was made and served on Safenames, requiring it to transfer the domain name immediately transferred to an account of Kentucky.
United StatesIntellectual Property
IPKat
IPKat
  • Article

    Music Streaming Rights Are Included In ASCAP's Licenses

    ASCAP is a performing rights organization that represents almost half of all composers and music publishers in the United States.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    McDermott Will & Emery
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article

    Rise Of The Machines: How AI Is Shaking Up The Music Industry

    Just like Napster triggered a global, technological shift in the way music is consumed and distributed, we are now on the precipice of another major revolution certain to disrupt the music industry.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Sheppard
    Sheppard
  • Article

    SEP Licensing Wins Continue—Multinational Litigation Strategy Drives Licensing Win For Ericsson

    Ericsson finally sees resolution of its standard essential patent ("SEP") campaign against Lenovo and Motorola, filed globally in multiple jurisdictions, importantly at the U.S. International Trade Commission ("ITC").
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    Supreme Court Reins In Permanent Injunctions in Patent Cases

    In a May 15, 2006 landmark decision from a unanimous Court, the Supreme Court rejected a rule applied by the Federal Circuit requiring district courts to issue permanent injunctions against patent infringement absent exceptional circumstances.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Duane Morris LLP
    Duane Morris LLP
  • Article

    The AI Tools Speeding Up Drug Discovery Come With Risky Fine Print

    Researchers routinely use AI tools like AlphaFold and Schrödinger's software without scrutinizing license agreements that contain restrictions on commercial use, confidentiality, and mandatory disclosure requirements. These overlooked terms can create significant legal obstacles when translating academic innovations into commercial products, affecting everything from sponsored research agreements to patent filings and university spinouts.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    The Second Time's A Charm: In New Damages Trial, Texas Jury More Than Doubles Lump-Sum Award Against Samsung For Infringing Two SEPs

    On April 17, 2024, a second Texas jury assessed damages of $142 million against Samsung, more than doubling a previous jury award of $67.5...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    THE SEP WORLD IN BALANCE: UK Harmonizes With Germany's Rejection Of Implementer Hold Out

    Another major development in global standard essential patent litigation was handed down today.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    Tough PTAB Fight Ahead For Breakthrough Gene-Editing Tech

    Gerard P. Norton, Ph.D. was featured in the Law360 article "Tough PTAB Fight Ahead For Breakthrough Gene-Editing Tech".
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Reorganizing Your Subsidiaries? Pay Me Again For That Software!

    A recent opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit serves as a strong reminder to those structuring and evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and even internal corporate reorganizations to carefully consider the impact of federal intellectual property laws on the transferability of licensed software and other licensed intellectual property.
    United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Saul Ewing LLP
    Saul Ewing LLP
  • Article

    Leveling The Playing Field: Regulation Of Esports NFTs

    Many believe that non-fungible tokens are poised to revolutionize the esports industry.
    United StatesTechnology
    Gamma Law
    Gamma Law
  • Article

    DOJ’s Recent Statements Reflect Consistent Focus, Balanced Approach To Antitrust And IP Enforcement

    The U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division has issued a series of statements and policy guidance clarifying that strong patent rights and antitrust enforcement are complementary forces that together promote innovation. Through recent court filings and official speeches, the DOJ has addressed critical questions about injunctive relief for patent holders, the relationship between standard-essential patents and market power, and the proper boundaries between contract disputes and antitrust violations.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Wiley Rein
    Wiley Rein
  • Article

    U.S. Department Of Justice Rejects Modification Of Music Licensing Consent Decrees

    After a two-year investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice has decided not to seek modification of longstanding music licensing consent decrees with the ASCAP and Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI).
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    Just What Does A Foreign Filing License Cover?

    A U.S. subsidiary of a German company sends all invention disclosures to its parent company in Germany for review by the company’s patent committee. In an effort to reduce costs, another U.S. company decides to outsource its patent processing to a technology center in India.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Foley & Lardner LLP
  • Article

    A Patent Licensee's Infringing Activity Outside A Licensed Field Of Use Does Not Breach The License

    A patent license agreement with a field of use provision limiting the scope of the licensed activity did not contractually obligate the licensee to refrain from acting outside the scope of the field of use.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Beware Audit Terms In Microsoft's New MPSA

    Microsoft is in the process of transitioning many of its volume-licensing customers from the Select Plus Agreement to the new Microsoft Products and Services Agreement.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Scott & Scott LLP
    Scott & Scott LLP
  • Article

    Comparing Social Media Intellectual Property Policies: Part 2 – Social Media User Agreements

    Social media users come in all shapes and sizes, ranging from individuals to large corporations. Users post text, images, video and sound files on social media sites.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    BakerHostetler
    BakerHostetler
  • Article

    Cutting Off The Counterfeiter’s Lifeline

    When it comes to counterfeiters, I try to be the leach that sucks their blood dry. Cease-and-desist letters are fine, DMCA takedown letters are helpful, but if you really want to cause them pain and stop them from infringing, you need to cut off their lifeline: cash flow.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Venable LLP
    Venable LLP
  • Showing 481–500 of 1201 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics