Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,295 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Hedy Lamarr – When Beauty And Brains Collide (Women's History Month)

    Hedy Lamarr was considered one of the most beautiful actresses during MGM's "Golden Years" but did you know she was also an inventor of some very important technology during World War II.
    United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
    Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
    Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
  • Article

    "Blurred Lines" But Clear Verdict: Jury Awards Gaye Estate $7.3 Million In Damages For Copyright Infringement

    In a verdict on March 10, a Los Angeles federal jury decided "Blurred Lines," written by Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, substantially borrowed from Marvin Gaye’s 1977 classic "Got To Give It Up" without permission.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Reed Smith
Reed Smith
  • Article

    Celebrity Trademark Watch: Can Taylor Swift Shake Off Accusations Of Trademark Greed?

    Had enough of Taylor Swift yet? For those of you who hate to love her, you might consider Swiftamine, because she is not going anywhere anytime soon.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Comment Period On Regulations Relating To Mechanical Licensing Collective Created By The Music Modernization Act

    On March 13, 2019, the Copyright Royalty Judges issued regulations regarding the procedures for determination and allocation of assessments to fund the mechanical licensing collective ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Orrick
    Orrick
  • Article

    Creating A Spotify Brand Playlist? First, Consider Spotify's Terms

    Streaming music services such as Spotify offer interesting new avenues for engaging consumer audiences.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
  • Article

    District Court Rejects Plaintiff's Bid To Extend IPR Estoppel To Institution Denials

    A federal judge in the Northern District of California recently rejected an argument that would have expanded inter partes review (IPR)
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Akin
    Akin
  • Article

    Finguerra-DuCharme Discusses Implications Of Apple Music Trademark Ruling

    Pryor Cashman Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme, co-chair of the Trademark Practice and Fashion Group, spoke with Bloomberg Law about
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Pryor Cashman LLP
    Pryor Cashman LLP
  • Article

    It's A Date – Twitter Reply Proves Prior Art Publication Date

    Before Newman, O'Malley, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Knobbe Martens
    Knobbe Martens
  • Article

    Judge Chastises Plaintiff In Counterfeit Unicorn Case For Seeking Emergency TRO During Global Pandemic

    On Wednesday last week, Judge Seeger in the Northern District of Illinois issued an opinion chastising Art Ask Agency for repeatedly seeking an expedited hearing on its trademark and copyright TRO...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
  • Article

    Nealy Sings A New Tune For Copyright Holders

    Under the Copyright Act, a plaintiff must file a suit for infringement of copyright "within three years after the claim accrues." 17 U.S.C.§507(b).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
    Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
  • Article

    No Summary Judgment Where Primary Reference Might Not Be "Basically The Same" As Asserted Design Patent

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the district court improperly resolved a genuine dispute of material fact with respect to summary judgment of invalidity for design patent....
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    McDermott Will & Emery
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article

    Pryor Cashman Continues To Support Creative Community In AI Copyright Case

    In a lawsuit filed by music publishers against Anthropic PBC for its unlicensed exploitation of their copyrighted lyrics in its generative artificial intelligence platform, “Claude,” Pryor Cashman...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Pryor Cashman LLP
    Pryor Cashman LLP
  • Article

    PTAB: Statements About Device Not Disclosed In A Video Are Not Prior Art; Concurrence: Video Itself—If Publicly Available—Is Prior Art

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied a petition to institute inter partes review, finding there was no reasonable likelihood that petitioners would prevail on their obviousness challenges.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Akin
    Akin
  • Article

    Relying On Outside Prior Art In An IPR – Not So Fast!

    The Board may then institute a review and consider the evidence on those grounds.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    Sammataro And Saady Write About AI Music And Copyright

    U.S. courts have yet to answer this question decisively.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Pryor Cashman LLP
    Pryor Cashman LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Affirms 100+ Year Period For Copyright Damages

    In Warner Chappel Music, Inc., v. Sherman Nealy, [22–1078] (May 9, 2024), the Supreme Court finally clarified copyright's 3-year statute of limitations (17 U. S. C. §507(b))...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Harness IP
    Harness IP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Declines Review Of California Resale Royalty Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal of last year's Ninth Circuit decision striking down part of the California Resale Royalty Act.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Sullivan & Worcester
    Sullivan & Worcester
  • Article

    Taylor Swift Fights Back!

    Last month, I blogged about a suit filed against Taylor Swift by Evermore Park, a Utah-based "immersive experience theme park."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
  • Article

    The Impact Of Artificial Intelligence On The Music Industry

    One of the most striking developments in the music industry in 2023 was the release of the song "Heart on my Sleeves" by an anonymous user named "Ghostwriter" using the AI-created voices of world-famous singers...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Gün + Partners
    Gün + Partners
  • Article

    What Does "Prior Art" Mean In Copyright Law?

    The traditional understanding in copyright law is that the concept of "prior art" is only applicable to patents and that the term is not relevant in assessing whether a defendant has infringed someone's copyright.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fenwick
    Fenwick
  • Showing 421–440 of 1295 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics