8,398 results found

Cynthia J. Vatalaro sued the county for a violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5, alleging that the county illegally retaliated against her ...

In a decision issued on March 12, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rejected an NLRB order that sought to require the University of Southern California ...

The case is M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, 2015 WL 303218 (U.S. Jan. 26, 2015).

My colleague Mark Beutler wrote a detailed blog post in March about the employer's request that the Supreme Court review the Third Circuit's decision in Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 656 F.3d 189 (3d Cir. 2011).

In what can only be called a refreshing display of common sense, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that pharmaceutical representatives are exempt outside salespeople.

The California Supreme Court announced today that it will hear oral arguments in the landmark wage-and-hour case "Brinker Restaurant v. Superior Court" on November 8 in San Francisco.

The Supreme Court ruled that Hobby Lobby could claim a religious exemption to the requirement that they provide health insurance for contraceptives.

On Tuesday, October 15, 2013, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case likely to have wide-ranging consequences for employers who offer employee benefit plans under Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA").

34th Annual Parsons Behle & Latimer Employment Law Seminar June 16, 2022...

Court cases challenging the actions of Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciaries have continued unabated since the scandal of Enron in 2002.

Part 1 of "The Threat Within" addressed the best preventive steps a dental practice should take to prepare for an employee's departure when that employee seeks to compete with the practice.

Continuing the trend of exposing companies who have misclassified workers, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has persuaded its latest target...

In Duran vs. U.S. Bank, the California Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeal's ruling and remanded a new trial on liability and damages in this misclassification suit.

Regardless of your opinion on the decision, we can all agree that the world looks different now that abortion access is no longer guaranteed.

In Zavala v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2012 WL 3217522 (3d Cir. August 9, 2012), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals clarified the standard for final certification of a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), affirming the district court’s decision to deny final certification of a class of janitors that alleged that Wal-Mart failed to pay overtime, and instead engaged in an unlawful enterprise of transporting and harboring illegal immigrants and imprisoning them in stores, in vi

In a precedential opinion, the Third Circuit held that an arbitration provision contained in an employment agreement signed by the plaintiff upon hiring was enforceable and compelled the plaintiff, who filed a class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act over automatic meal break deductions, to submit her claims to arbitration.

The speakers discuss the burdens associated with obtaining an injunction during a labor dispute, in addition to California's Moscone Act and relevant case law.

Integrity Staffing required its employees to undergo a screening before leaving the warehouse at the end of each day.