Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

8,397 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Breaking News: Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Gay Marriage

    USA Today is reporting that the Supreme Court has announced that it will hear four cases that address bans on same-sex marriage.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Broker-Dealer Settles Overtime Claims Brought By Financial Advisors Across The Country

    UBS announced on February 9, 2006, that it had reached agreement to pay $89 million to settle a series of collective actions brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state law
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Dorsey & Whitney LLP
    Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Article

Buyer Permitted To Enforce Arbitration Agreement With Acquired Company’s Employees

DirecTV moved to compel arbitration based on the arbitration agreement that Marenco executed with 180 Connect.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Fenwick
Fenwick
  • Video

    California's Stalled Ban On Arbitration Provisions In Employment Agreements (Video)

    In this week's episode of TLDR, Tricia Legittino provides an update on California's failure to launch its ban on arbitration provisions in employment agreements.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
    Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
  • Article

    California Employee Is Compelled To Litigate His Employment Claims In Indiana

    Jerome Nedd was employed by Ryze Claim Solutions in El Cerrito, California for almost three years before his employment was terminated, resulting in his filing claims against Ryze for wrongful termination...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article

    California Employers Should Closely Monitor These Six Critical Bills

    In his bylined article for The Recorder titled "Legislative Six-Pack: California Employers Should Closely Monitor These Six Critical Bills,"
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fisher Phillips LLP
    Fisher Phillips LLP
  • Article

    California Justices Back Class Action Waiver But Decide A PAGA Claim Is Not Preempted

    David F. Faustman was mentioned in an article, "California Justices Back Class Action Waiver But Decide a PAGA Claim Is Not Preempted."
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    California Law Should Have Been Applied To Determine If Drivers Were Employees Or Independent Contractors

    Fernando Ruiz and similarly situated drivers filed a class action against Affinity alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and California law for failure to pay overtime, failure to pay wages, improper charges for workers' compensation insurance and unfair business practices.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article

    California Ranked #1 "Judicial Hellhole"

    I would be so happy to be able to say California is number one with reference to The University of California Golden Bear football team.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    California Reclaims Status As #1 Judicial Hellhole

    I've been following California's "judicial hellhole" rankings for a couple of years now.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    California Supreme Court Approves Union Picketing In Front Of Store Entrances

    Ralphs Grocery sought an injunction to prevent a labor union from picketing on the privately owned walkway in front of the only customer entrance to its store.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article

    Certification Was Properly Denied In Class Action Seeking Reimbursement From Employer

    Crystal Morgan and two other former employees sued Wet Seal because the company allegedly required employees to purchase Wet Seal clothing and merchandise as a condition of employment and also failed to reimburse employees for their mileage between Wet Seal business locations.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article

    Change Is Coming For California Businesses. Here's What To Do.

    California's Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law Assembly Bill 5, a bill significantly altering the standard for classifying a worker as an employee versus an independent contractor.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    BakerHostetler
    BakerHostetler
  • Article

    Clients Want Predictability. Can Employment Lawyers Give It to Them?

    We all know that clients don’t like surprises. In litigation, they want to know what matters will cost and the likelihood of an adverse outcome.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Company Allowed To Pursue Suit Against Former Employee For Unfair Competition Despite Absence Of Trade-Secret Violation

    In Angelica Textile Services, Inc. v. Park, a California court of appeal considered the issue whether Angelica’s common-law claims for breach of contract, unfair competition, and interference with business relations would be allowed to proceed against a former employee despite the absence of any trade-secret violation
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fenwick
    Fenwick
  • Article

    Comprehensive Handbook Helped Lead To Dismissal of Case

    Complying with Fair Labor Standards Act posting requirements and maintaining a comprehensive handbook are key strategies hospitality companies can use to defend themselves in the event of an FLSA retaliation claim.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Controlled Substances Act Does Not Shield Marijuana Businesses From FLSA Or Other Claims

    An employee of a marijuana dispensary in Colorado filed a claim in federal court alleging that he was not paid overtime in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Reed Smith
    Reed Smith
  • Article

    Court Affirms Jury Verdict Finding Safeway Manager Was Exempt From Overtime

    Safeway Wage & Hour Cases, 2019 WL 6954322 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article

    Court Denies Motion For Sanctions Absent Evidence Information Existed And Was Destroyed

    In Kincaid v. Wells Fargo Securities LLC, et. al., U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul J. Cleary denied Plaintiff's Motion for an Adverse Inference Instruction, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove that any relevant evidence was destroyed or withheld.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Littler Mendelson
    Littler Mendelson
  • Article

    Court Denies Motion To Compel Facebook Authorization Citing Insufficient Showing Of Relevance

    In Tompkins v. Detroit Metropolitan Airport, et. al. [pdf], No. 10-1-413, U.S. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen denied Defendant Northwest Airlines' Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Execute Facebook Authorizations, holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate the plaintiff's Facebook activity contained information relevant to the litigation.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Littler Mendelson
    Littler Mendelson
  • Showing 201–220 of 8397 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics