Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

34,872 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Delaware Senate Confirms The Nomination Of Jennifer Ranji

    The Delaware Senate has confirmed the nomination of Jennifer Ranji to serve as a Judge of the Family Court.
    United StatesFamily and Matrimonial
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Video

    Webinar – A DVPO Was Entered Against Your Ex Partner, What Now? (Video)

    Attorney Mackenzie O. Bretz explores the legal implications and practical steps that follow when a Domestic Violence Protection Order (DVPO) is issued against a former partner. This webinar addresses the critical questions and concerns that arise in the aftermath of such an order, providing guidance on navigating the legal landscape and understanding your rights and obligations.
    United StatesFamily and Matrimonial
    Beresford Booth
    Beresford Booth
Article

MassMutual Motion For Partial Summary Judgment Denied As To 9 Of 10 Securitizations

Judge Mastroianni granted the motion as to the tenth securitization, based on his finding that there was no evidence that acquisition diligence was conducted on over 80% of the underlying loan pools.
United StatesFinance and Banking
Orrick
Orrick
  • Article

    New York Court Of Appeals Hears Arguments On RMBS Put-Back Claim Statute Of Limitations

    On April 30, 2015, New York’s highest court heard arguments in ACE Securities Corp. v. DB Structured Products Inc. regarding the accrual date for RMBS put-back claims – i.e., the date on which the statute of limitations begins to run.
    United StatesFinance and Banking
    Orrick
    Orrick
  • Article

    Advocacy Group Sues For Info On Pork Inspections System

    Food & Water Watch Inc. (FWW) has filed a lawsuit alleging that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has "engaged in dilatory and obstructionist tactics" to avoid fulfilling the ...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
    Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • Article

    Chipotle Settles GMO Lawsuit for $6.5 Million

    Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. has agreed to pay $6.5 million to settle allegations that it misleadingly marketed its food as free of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
    Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • Article

    Claim Construction Victory For Client Shire

    On March 23, 2015, District Judge Charlene Honeywell from the U.S. Middle District of Florida in Tampa issued a favorable claim construction ruling for FLH client Shire Pharmaceuticals.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Defense Of Claims Against Ambulatory Surgical Centers

    Sean Maraynes (Associate-White Plains) published "Defense of Claims Against Ambulatory Surgical Centers" in the August 28, 2019...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
    Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
  • Article

    New York Court Of Appeals Refuses To Reinstate Ban On Large Sodas

    New York's high court ruled that New York City's health department exceeded its authority when it banned the sale of sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    Garreth DeVoe Authored An Article In The ABA TYL Magazine

    Garreth DeVoe authored an article in the Winter issue of the ABA TYL Magazine, "Removing Politics From State Judicial Selection."
    United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • Article

    Utica Mutual Must Defend Broker In Suit, NJ Court Says

    Barry J. Muller is featured in the Law360 article, "Utica Mutual Must Defend Broker In Suit, NJ Court Says."
    United StatesInsurance
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    A Piece Of Federal Circuit History – March 12, 2018

    In 1980, President Jimmy Carter named Helen W. Nies to the United States Customs and Patent Appeals Court.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    IPR Filing Receipts Can Take A Month To Issue

    In the early days of AIA trials, the PTAB was able to issue filing notices less than a week after petition filing.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    No longer available on Mondaq

    At a recent forum sponsored by the Boston Bar Association and the Boston Patent Law Association, attendees were treated to significant insights into how judges in the District of Massachusetts view patent cases.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution Pointer 169

    A request to withdraw an ex parte appeal may be filed any time before a decision is rendered by the Board. Withdrawal of the appeal may result in the abandonment of some or all claims.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution Pointer 172

    To request a telephonic or video hearing in an ex parte appeal, a written request must be filed with the Board
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution Pointer 271

    Third parties do not have standing to demand the USPTO issue or refuse to issue a Certificate of Correction. See Hallmark Card, Inc. v. Lehman, 959 F. Supp. 539, 543-44, 42 USPQ2d 1134, 1138.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Prosecution Pointer 411

    The USPTO published guidelines for ascertaining compliance with the enablement requirement under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (a) during prosecution in view of the May 2023 U.S. Supreme Court...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Apple Inc., No. 15-777 (S. Ct. Mar. 21, 2016)

    The Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider the following question: Where a design patent is applied to only a component of a product, should an award of infringer's profits be limited...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Reset One-Year Time Bar

    In Click-To-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 2015-1242, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2018) (en banc), the Federal Circuit found that the PTAB's treatment of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a district court litigation as resetting the IPR one-year-from-service bar is incorrect.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Showing 21–40 of 34872 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics