5,735 results found

California has a new tool in the toolbox when it comes to remedies available for certain consumer protection law violations. The governor of California recently signed legislation...

The companies include Affirm, Afterpay, Klarna, PayPal, and Zip.

On December 19, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed four nearly identical lawsuits against lenders based in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

On January 24, the CFPB issued a notice and request for comment in the Federal Register regarding the Bureau's inquiry into "buy now, pay later" or BNPL providers.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") seeks further comment on a proposed report summarizing consumer tests of sample periodic form statements that must be provided by servicers...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") has announced its first data security enforcement action.

The court treated the Chapter 93A theory as substantively deficient.

This Episode discusses the "Quiet Hours" provision of the TCPA and the viability of a claim where prior express written consent was obtained from the consumer.

Episode 12 is now live. In this episode of Consumer Counterpoint, we sit down with Gina Ferrari, National Chair of Seyfarth's Litigation Department...

Episode 4 is now live. In this episode of Consumer Counterpoint, we discuss the recent Supreme Court decision in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation...

Episode 9 is now live. In this Episode, Kristine is joined by guest and colleague Danny Riley to discuss privacy compliance on consumer facing websites including opt-out rights and regulators' enforcement in this area.

In this Quick Take Episode, we discuss the Supreme Court's recent grant of certiorari on a Sixth Circuit decision holding that an individual who subscribes to an email newsletter is not a "consumer" under the VPPA.

Alexis joined the CFPB in 2012 from Mayer Brown.

Consumers questions and complaints about consumer financial products and services can now be directed via a new non-emergency "hotline".

In Zamani v. SharkNinja, Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128075, the District Court concluded that a plaintiff's Chapter 93A "omission" claim was not well-pleaded enough to survive...

In Zamani v. SharkNinja, Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128075, the District Court concluded that a plaintiff's Chapter 93A "omission" claim was not well-pleaded enough to survive a motion to dismiss based on hyperlinks that rebutted the alleged omission.

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a seismic shift in priorities for many businesses that provide consumers with goods and services