Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Court Of Appeal, April 17, 2026, Order Concerning A Request For Provisional Measures, UPC_CoA_901/2025

    The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal in Luxembourg addresses critical questions about patent claim interpretation, indirect infringement liability, and the assessment of non-technical features in inventive step analysis. This landmark decision examines whether software apps distributed through app stores can constitute indirect infringement and establishes important precedents for timeline graph interpretation in patent claims.
    LuxembourgIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Loi Du 24 Février 2015 Modifiant Le Code D’instruction Criminelle Afin D’y Introduire Le Jugement Sur Accord (Mémorial A N° 33 Du 4 Mars 2015, P. 350 Et S.)

    Le Grand-Duché du Luxembourg vient de se doter d’un nouvel instrument procédural en matière pénale, afin de désengorger les tribunaux et rendre une justice plus rapide et plus efficace : le « jugement sur accord ».
    LuxembourgLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Wildgen
    Wildgen
  • Article

    Arendt Case Review #11 - June 2021 - Arendt Litigation Group

    Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by the Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.
    LuxembourgLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Arendt & Medernach
    Arendt & Medernach
  • Article

    Court Of Appeal – Right To Be Heard, Manifest Error, And Suspensive Effect In UPC Patent Appeal Proceedings – UPC-CoA-93/2026, 15 July 2026, Siemens Healthineers AG v. Hologic, Inc.

    The Court of Appeal in Luxembourg addresses a critical application for suspensive effect in ongoing appeal proceedings between medical technology companies. This case involves patent EP 2 352 431 and raises important questions about procedural rights under the Unified Patent Court Agreement and the European Convention on Human Rights.
    LuxembourgIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Arendt Case Review #4 - December 2018

    Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.
    LuxembourgLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Arendt & Medernach
    Arendt & Medernach
  • Article

    Neuer Schutz für Geschäftsgeheimnisse im Zivilprozess

    Im April 2025 trat das Gesetz zur Stärkung des Justizstandorts Deutschland durch die Einführung von Commercial Courts und der Gerichtssprache Englisch in der Zivilgerichtsbarkeit (Justizstandort-Stärkungsgesetz) in Kraft.
    LuxembourgIntellectual Property
    Luther Luxembourg S.A.
    Luther Luxembourg S.A.
  • Article

    Arendt Case Review #15 - December 2022 - Arendt Litigation Group

    Clara Mara-Marhuenda François Kremer Philippe Schmit Christian Point Thierry Lesage Ari Gudmannsson Eric Fort Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch Paschalis Paschalidis Jean-Luc Putz...
    LuxembourgLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Arendt & Medernach
    Arendt & Medernach
  • Article

    Arendt Case Review #8 - February 2020

    Arendt Case Review is a newsletter designed by Arendt Litigation Group to inform you about recent decisions of the Luxembourg and/or European courts.
    LuxembourgCorporate/Commercial Law
    Arendt & Medernach
    Arendt & Medernach
  • Article

    International Arbitration Comparative Guide

    International Arbitration Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Luxembourg, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
    LuxembourgLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Chevalier & Sciales
    Chevalier & Sciales

Showing 21–29 of 29 results

Previous
Legal Intelligence Newsletters