This Connect provides a brief overview of the judgement of the Supreme Court in the Larsen & Toubro case where it examined whether an arbitral tribunal could award pre-award...

The Delhi District and Sessions Judge (HQ) issued an advisory on 29.03.2020, requesting advocates and litigants to address arguments through video conference as a precaution due to prevalent COVID-19 pandemic ...

Exclusive Series Hosted By NDA – Bilateral Investment Treaties And International Commercial Arbitration

The applicants of all Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can directly file Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon'ble Supreme Court against any order of Intellectual...

Judicial Expropriation In Investment Arbitration (April 04, 2019) (Video)

Judicial Expropriation In Investment Arbitration (April 04, 2019)

Latest Amendments Approved By The Union Cabinet To The Arbitration Act.

Latest Techniques And Innovative Procedures For Effective Dispute Resolution.

Recent Arbitration Reforms in India (Nov 23, 2015)

Round Table : Bilateral Investment Treaty Arbitration Launch In Association With SIAC (May 02, 2019)

With more than Twenty Seven million cases pending in the subordinate Courts across the country, there is a need to look beyond the traditional methods.

The Allahabad High Court in Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. v. State of U.P., held that the writ jurisdiction can be invoked to safeguard existing rights and not for seeking to establish any new right.

Bombay High Court on Society Membership: Basement & Parking Owners Not “Flat” Owners

The High Court of Delhi through its judgment dated 11.11.2025 in Manmohan Gaind v. Negolice India Pvt. Ltd , held that a cheque issued as a security may constitute a legally enforceable instrument under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("NI Act"), if any subsisting liability exists on the date of its presentation.

Our partner, Shalini Sati Prasad, was recently invited by Lion Amirr Virani to contribute her insights in a episode of The Emerging Lawyer series on The Koffee Conversation Show.

On May 19, 2025, the Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ appeal filed by Gstaad Hotels Pvt. Ltd., rejecting claims of ignorance about...

The Supreme Court of India establishes the definitive framework for judicial interference in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This landmark ruling clarifies the boundaries of court intervention, emphasizing that courts cannot function as appellate bodies by re-evaluating evidence or substituting their own interpretations for those of arbitrators.

The National Highways Authority of India has introduced a transformative policy circular that fundamentally restructures how infrastructure disputes are resolved. This new value-based approach eliminates traditional multi-tier mechanisms, establishing clear thresholds that determine whether conflicts proceed to arbitration or alternative resolution pathways. The reform promises to significantly impact how stakeholders navigate disagreements in India's infrastructure sector.

A batch of writ petitions arose from a common grievance that the GST authorities had uploaded show cause notices and order-in-originals only on the GST common portal under the tab “View Additional Notices and Orders,” without serving themin any other effective manner on the taxpayers. The lead matter was CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and the Court treated it as the lead case for all connected petitions.

In Bhagyalaxmi Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Babaldas Amtharam Patel & Ors., the Supreme Court of India clarifies the extent of a surety’s liability under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.