225 results found

Court finds risk of dissipation in a freezing order application and considers material non-disclosure point.

The Supreme Court of India has delivered a landmark ruling on the enforceability of foreign court judgments in India, specifically addressing whether summary judgments rendered without full trial proceedings meet the statutory requirements under the Code of Civil Procedure. This decision has significant implications for cross-border litigation and the recognition of foreign judicial decisions in Indian courts.

Signing Ceremony Of The Guide On Mutual Recognition And Enforcement Of Civil And Commercial Judgments In DIFC Courts And Courts In India Between DIFC Courts And Nishith Desai Associates (September 14, 2018)

The Kerala High Court delivered a significant judgment addressing whether an individual's wish to donate their body after death should be honored, even when family members object. This case examines the legal and ethical dimensions of posthumous bodily autonomy and the extent to which personal decisions about one's own body can override familial preferences.

According to the Code of Civil Procedure, in civil cases, the trial judicial process begins with the filing of a plaint wherein the plaintiff lays down the grievances and the prayer sought for.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 16.06.2026 in Smt. Khatiza Begam v. Ms. Salma Khan , dismissed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), by relying on the settled law that the jurisdiction of the Second Appellate Court is confined to cases involving a substantial question of law and cannot be invoked for reappreciation of evidence or factual findings.

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 03.11.2025 in MMTC Limited v. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Ltd. , held that objections to the enforcement of an arbitral award under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("CPC") lies within a narrow compass.

The Supreme Court through its judgment dated 01.04.2026 in Rajiv Gaddh v. Subodh Parkash , held that a party abandoning earlier arbitral proceedings cannot subsequently file a fresh application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”) on the same cause of action.

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 08.05.2026 in the matter of Sheikh Abedin v Iqbal Ahmed & Another held that final decree under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) can be passed, based on admission made in course of criminal proceedings.

The Bombay High Court's recent judgment in Flagship Infrastructure Limited examines whether the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA) continues to apply to deemed conveyance proceedings in township projects. This podcast episode analyzes the court's interpretation of statutory provisions and their implications for property developers and flat owners in Maharashtra's real estate sector.

The Calcutta High Court's Division Bench has ruled on a critical procedural question regarding the appealability of Single Bench decisions in trademark matters.

The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 23.03.2026 in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain & Ors...

The High Court of Madras through its judgment dated 17.11.2025 in Electronics Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. v. ICMC Corporation Ltd.

Observing that statutory provision contained in the principal legislation that is Section 74(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, is mandatory, the Allahabad High Court has held that the use of the word ‘may’ in Rule 142(1A)...

Union of India entered into a contract with the Associated Construction Co. for the provision of OTM Accommodation for CASD at Delhi Cantt-10.

The Government of Maharashtra acting through Law and Judiciary Department on 16 January 2024 notified an amendment to Section 1(2) of the Bombay City Civil Court Act...

Under Indian Laws especially under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ("CPC") there are questions which may not have a definite answer.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 20.05.2026 in the matter of GAC Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Acer Logistics Pvt. Ltd., inter alia, held that under Section 20(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), even if part of the cause of action arises within the territorial jurisdiction of a court, such court would have jurisdiction to entertain the suit.