3,988 results found

The Delhi High Court has recently interpreted the Supreme Court judgement in Bharat Aluminium Company v Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. (2012) 9 SCC 552 (‘BALCO') to lay down which courts would have jurisdiction for proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act').

Recently, the Allahabad High Court in the case of Chanchal Sonkar v. Chairman, State Bank of India made a significant observation regarding compassionate appointments...

This case concerns a recent decision dated 14 October 2025 by the Bombay High Court in the case of NESCO Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., wherein Justices G.S.

The Supreme Court in Asian Paints Limited v. Ram Babu & Another addressed an important question regarding whether an entity that suffers loss from an offence, even if not the original complainant, qualifies as a "victim" ...

Recently, the Supreme Court vide its Order dated 7 May 2025 passed in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee and Ors. in C.A. No. 408 of 2023...

The Supreme Court has reiterated that there cannot be an automatic vacation of a stay order if the trial has not concluded.

HSA Advocates successfully represented MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited (MBPMPL), in proceedings before the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC)

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has allowed applications filed under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for extension of time to conclude arbitration proceedings, holding that an application...

The Supreme Court vide its order permitted the use of petcoke and furnace oil by cement industries in the states of Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana.

According to §18 of the Limitation Act 1963, an acknowledgment of liability in writing before the expiry of the limitation period will reset the limitation clock to the date of the acknowledgment.

§16 of the Act provides that a Tribunal is empowered to decide questions relating to its own jurisdiction. §16(5) of the Act provides that a Tribunal "shall decide on a plea" regarding its...

The Supreme Court's decision in Home Care Retail Marts Pvt. Ltd. v. Haresh N. Sanghavi addresses a critical question in arbitration law: can a party that loses in arbitral proceedings still seek interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after an award is rendered but before enforcement? This ruling resolves conflicting High Court interpretations and clarifies the scope of interim measures available to all parties, regardless of their success in arbitration.

The Supreme Court recently, in a case titled "Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit and others v. Dr. Manu and another", has explained when an amendment can be held to be a clarificatory which has a retrospective effect.

In a landmark ruling on a foreign entity's taxable presence in India, the Supreme Court in Hyatt International Southwest Asia Ltd. v Additional Director of Income-tax, 2025 INSC 891 held that the existence of sustained, pervasive, and enforceable control ...

On 02.01.2025, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal ("REAT") in Atul Prabhu vs. Neptune Ventures & Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. directed civil imprisonment against the promoter/ director for non- compliance with a previous order passed by the REAT.

In a recent judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India, the Court addressed the contentious issue of earnest money forfeiture in real estate transactions.

On Monday, 2nd November 2020, the bench comprising of Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Vineet Saran in its judgment held that Section 79 of the RERA Act does not in any way bar the Commission or Forum under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act to entertain any complaint.

The Supreme Court of India, delivered a pointed reminder that the supervisory jurisdiction conferred upon High Courts by Article 227 of the Constitution is not a clandestine corridor for re-hearing appeals.