3,988 results found

Trademarks represent a distinct type of intangible property. It is any device or mark which identifies the goods or services of one party and distinguishes them from competitors.

The Delhi High Court has ruled on a trademark dispute involving the mark ALPHARD, examining whether transborder reputation and unsolicited imports of luxury vehicles into India can establish goodwill sufficient to qualify a mark as 'well-known' under Indian law. The case required the court to distinguish the Supreme Court's Prius decision and evaluate whether voluntary importation by third parties, without formal commercial launch, demonstrates actionable recognition within the relevant consumer segment.

This may sound difficult given that commercial places in India have taken right to play the music as their inherent one.

When any grantee or applicant, license or assign their patent rights to any licensee then such license or assignment deed holds importance for its assignee and its licensee.

In an interesting turn of events Delhi High Court allowed organizers of "Durga Puja", a hindu festival, to use images from the best-seller, Harry Potter, created by J.K. Rowling.

In-house counsel employed by corporations are not entitled to attorney-client privilege due to their employment status and lack of professional independence, says the Supreme Court

The Bombay High Court has ruled that an award that relies on documents produced after the conclusion of arguments is patently illegal.

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court, in Banque Cantonale De Geneve vs. Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M V Polaris Galaxy by its recent judgement and order of 13 July 2021, provided much needed guidance ...

"Reputation is an extremely delicate thing. It takes years to build, but can be destroyed in an instant." This quote underscores the essence of the recent legal battle...

The Larger Bench of the CESTAT has held that for the purpose of eligibility of Cenvat credit on GTA service used for outward transportation, where clearances of goods are against FOR contract basis...

The legal nodus of determining the Jurisdistion of Courts in cheque bouncing cases has finally been resolved by the Supreme Court of India.

As a result, if a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act is dismissed by the Magistrate or if inadequate compensation is awarded, the complainant is now entitled to directly file an appeal, without seeking prior leave of the appropriate High court.

The Hon'ble Meghalaya High Court at Shillong vide its order dated May 13, 2022 in the matter of HDFC Bank Ltd. Mawlai Nonglum Branch & Anr v. Sri Baklai Siej & Anr.

The Supreme Court, in M/S Caravel Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Premier Sea Foods Exim Pvt. Ltd., helpfully clarified that the only pre-requisite of a valid arbitration agreement...

In M/S Jai Balaji Industries Vs. D. K. Mohanty & Anr., 2021, the Operational Creditor filed an appeal before the Supreme Court under Section 62 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against the order passed by NCLAT.

Nina Jankovic of Aceris Law delivered a comprehensive virtual session exploring the strategic foundations of international construction arbitration, examining how contractual decisions, risk allocation, and project documentation shape dispute outcomes. The presentation connected FIDIC contract structures, claim triggers, and dispute resolution mechanisms with practical arbitration strategy for construction projects spanning multiple jurisdictions.

The Supreme Court recently refused the enforcement of a foreign judgment passed by the High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division (“UK Court”) for failing to satisfy tests under Indian law which govern whether a foreign judgment is conclusive.