3,987 results found

Court finds risk of dissipation in a freezing order application and considers material non-disclosure point.

In the context of foreign-seated arbitrations, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that non-signatories to an agreement may be referred to arbitration in certain circumstances such as in case

By taking judicial notice of the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic to litigants all across the country and in view of the severity...

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 09.03.2026 in the matter of Gobind Singh and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

It was also observed that the Appellant failed to produce documentary evidence of the alleged loans and their repayment, and had challenged the transactions after an unexplained delay of nearly ten years, during which the GPAs remained uncancelled and subsequent transactions continued without objection. Finding no perversity, patent illegality or substantial question of law, the Court dismissed the appeal.

The Supreme Court through its judgement dated 09.07.2026 in the matter of M/s Levitate Mobile Technologies Private Limited v M/s Standard Chartered Bank & Another held that the Commercial Courts Act 2015 (“Commercial Courts Act”) is meant for expeditious disposal of commercial disputes and belated production of evidence, cannot water down the statutory intent and rigours of the Commercial Courts Act.

In March 2018, the Indian Supreme Court in Bar Council of India v AK Balaji decided on the scope of foreign lawyers and firms to practice in India.

In this edition of Podcast Bites, powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Apnatva examines the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal’s decision in M/s DLF Limited v. Gautam Ranavery, which reiterates the mandatory nature of the pre-deposit requirement for promoter appeals under Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Supreme Court has held that National Green Tribunal (NGT) is empowered to issue directives to the Centre for banning vehicles more than 15 years old from running on Delhi roads.

In light of orders of a nation-wide lockdown, the Supreme Court of India vide circular dated 26.03.2020 stated that it shall continue to function and to hear matters involving extreme urgency, till further orders in this regard.

The High Court of Bombay, in the matter titled Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Yogesh Babulal Mehta & Ors. , through its judgment dated 18.08.2026, held that a public authority is not under an obligation to collect or obtain information from a private body to furnish the same to an applicant seeking information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“RTI Act”).

Supreme Court through its judgement dated 08.05.2026 in the matter of Indian Railways v West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited & Others held that Indian Railways (“IR”) is not a Deemed Distribution Licensee (“DDL”) under Section 14 of the EA Act and is liable to pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge (“CSS”) and Additional Surcharge (“AS”) as stipulated in Section 42 of the EA Act.

The Bombay High Court recently pronounced its judgment in Madhu Ashok Kapur and Ors. v. Rana Kapoor and Ors., providing some relief in the twoyear long battle between Yes Bank and Madhu Kapur...

In the case of Bar Council of India vs. A.K. Balaji & Others, the Supreme Court of India had passed an interim order on July 4, 2012, directing the RBI not to grant any fresh permissions to foreign law firms...

Defining the powers and jurisdiction of specialized judicial bodies and the Courts is essential to ensure proper functioning of the legal system.

SEBI has introduced significant amendments to InvIT, AIF, and REIT regulations, lowering credit risk thresholds for liquid mutual funds and expanding investment flexibility.

Damages, as the name implies, refers to a form of compensation as a result of breach, loss or injury.

Submissions were made that the said Interlocutory application is pending for almost two and a half years but same has not been decided by the Hon'ble DRT.