662 results found

In the aforesaid case before the Appellate Tribunal, the appeal had arisen out of an order of the Tribunal (Mumbai bench) rejecting the insolvency application filed by an operational creditor.

In a most recent judgment, the Apex Court had the occasion to deal with an interesting issue i.e., "whether a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement can challenge the enforcement...

The Delhi High Court in M/s Indure Pvt. Ltd. v. Aneja Construction (India) Ltd. [2024:DHC:9861] reaffirmed the principle that statutory timelines for challenging arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act") are sacrosanct.

The Delhi High Court in Imran Ahmed Ansari & Anr. v. Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. & Anr. reaffirmed the narrow scope of judicial interference with arbitral awards under...

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment examining whether a summary judgment from an English Court can be enforced in India when it potentially violates principles of natural justice and contradicts mandatory conditions imposed by the Reserve Bank of India under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act.

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA) establishes a comprehensive legal framework governing the principles of relevancy and admissibility of evidence in both civil and criminal proceedings.

The judiciary through the various constitutional courts have played a transformative role in shaping and sculpting the legal landscape of India.

Welcome to the SARFAESI Newsletter for February 2025. This edition highlights significant recent legal developments under the SARFAESI Act and related financial statutes.

Jupiter Capital Pvt Ltd (‘Assessee') had acquired 15,33,40,900 shares having face value of INR 10 each in Asianet News Network Pvt Ltd (‘the Company').

A 9 (nine) judges Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") in the case of Mineral Area Development Authority and Anr. vs. Steel Authority of India and Anr.

Argus Partners maintains offices in three major Indian cities - Mumbai, New Delhi, and Bengaluru - providing legal services across the country. The firm's strategic presence in these key metropolitan areas enables comprehensive coverage of India's primary business and commercial centers. Contact information and physical addresses are provided for each location to facilitate client engagement.

In a significant judgment in the case of Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court addressed the nuanced issue of court fee refunds in cases...

In a recent judgment in H. Anjanappa v. A. Prabhakar , the Supreme Court of India dealt with the applicability of the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

In India, persons are not permitted to take forcible possession.

In the same statewide drive, two of Mumbai’s best known eateries, a 122 year old Irani cafe near Marine Lines and a well-known upmarket Chinese restaurant, have had their food licenses suspended. Both cases pose the same legal questions about the speed of a regulator’s action, what it must prove and when a suspension must end.

Typically, in M&A transactions, buyers undertake due diligence on targets prior to consummation of the transaction, to identify and assess key legal risks involved in the transaction.

In addition, the article also discusses the contours of applicability of the aforesaid sections.