633 results found

He who shall decide anything without the other side having been heard, although he may have said what is right, will not have been what is right, is a corollary deduced from the rule of audi alteram partem.

Citation: In the supreme court of India Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, Criminal Appeal no. 566 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 2301 of 2017) titled Ashok Munilal Jain And Anr. vs. Assistant Director, Directorate Of Enforcement.

The complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 r/w Section 420 of IPC, in the present case had been filed by Ms. Sairabee through a Special Power of Attorney holder, Sk. Tamisuddin, who in the present case is the Appellant.

In the ever-evolving landscape of cybercrime, where reality and deception dance on a digital tightrope, a new player has taken centre stage—deepfake technology.

In recent pronouncement by the Supreme Court of India recently delivered a judgment in Vishnu Vardhan @ Vishnu Pradhan vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Corporate fraud refers to any unethical or illegal actions undertaken by a business or its employees to gain an unfair advantage.

The exponential growth of the digital economy has fundamentally transformed how businesses, consumers, and service providers interact.

In recent years, alternative dispute resolution has become a booster for global commercial activities and has changed the traditional perception on the role of national judicial systems.

Whether the allegations of fraud would vitiate the arbitration agreement, and what would be the measure of damages in case of contract entered into on the basis of fraud or misrepresentations,

The procedures put in place to implement an organization's bribery prevention policies should be designed to mitigate identified risks as well as to prevent deliberate unethical conduct on the part of associated persons.

In the recent times, there has been a growing trend of lodging frivolous FIR's in otherwise purely commercial disputes with an intent to harass and intimidate the opposite party i.e., the company, its directors and/or its key managerial personnel.

Timing is everything when it comes to sports. This couldn't be more true, as the Government of India is set to discuss the Prevention of Sporting Fraud Bill, 2013 ("the Bill") in the Indian Parliament, in a bid to curb issues such as match fixing that have brought much embarrassment to the sporting community in India.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India recently on 07/05/2021 in Sanjay Kumar Rai v State of Uttar Pradesh and Another reiterated that orders framing charge or refusing discharge are neither...

In a recent judgment in Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. v. Antrix Corporation Ltd. & Anr., the Hon'ble Supreme Court has upheld the order of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)...

Mr. Ravijit Singh (Complainant) submitted that in April 2000, Mrs. Neeraj Dutta (Appellant), who was working as an Inspector in the D.V.B./ Electricity Department in the local area, demanded Rs. 10,000...

The Calcutta High Court, in Louis Dreyfus Company India Private Limited v. Enforcement Directorate, Government of India, CRR 1145 of 2024, examined the circumstances in which a person against whom no case was made out in the scheduled offence could nevertheless be proceeded against under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”). The Court quashed the PMLA proceedings against Louis Dreyfus Company India Private Limited (“LDC”), principally finding that the material collected by the Enforcement Directorate (“ED”) did not establish the requisite connection between LDC and the alleged proceeds of crime.

That the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India & Anr., Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 67 OF 2017, had struck down Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ...