2,877 results found

The Madras High Court has held that the Registrar of the Trademarks does not have the authority to impose restriction on the choice of the colours.

Consent for show cause hearings through video conferencing to be submitted by the concerned applicant or their authorised agent on or before September 5, 2020.

The subject matter in the case, "Lacoste & Anr v Global Impex India CA" was the trademark "LACOSTE" and the "Crocodile Device".

INTA Bulletins Law and Practice — Asia-Pacific Subcommittee

Irrespective of being big brands or smaller players, the awareness about protecting one's intellectual property is on the rise.

An application for the removal of a mark MATESHWARI which was filed by one M/s Shiv Kumar Sushil Kumar Tea Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. ("Shiv Kumar") ...

Indian law does not recognize the concept of trade dress specifically unlike the United States where the concept of trade dress has been provided recognition under the Lanham Act, 1946.

Around winters, does "Mocha" remind everyone of a steaming hot cup of Choco-coffee? Well, "Impresario" has other plans.

The value and repute of a well-established brand is undisputed. In such a case, while litigation may go on for long, parties sometimes find viable solutions in settlements. As witnessed in the case of Xerox Corporation and Anr. v. Sailash Patel and Others 2008 (37) PTC 526 (Del.), the Delhi High Court affirmed and validated the settlement arrived between the two parties, as regards the sale and distribution of its second hand products.

In a recent US case Royal Crown Company, Inc., Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., Vs. The Coca-Cola Company, the Coca-Cola Company applied for the registration of the term ZERO in order to claim exclusive rights over it and monopolize use of the term.

Stadmed Private Limited sought for registration of ‘Zytrin’ in respect of pharmaceutical and medicinal preparations. The mark was proposed to be in use since the date of application. The mark was subsequently advertised in the Trade Marks Journal before acceptance under Section 20(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The taxpayer is a private discretionary trust, which was settled for the exclusive benefit of the members of the promoter family.

The European Parliament had adopted the Artificial Intelligence Act ("AIAct") in May 2024. However, the same is yet to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

As consumerism in India grows, there is also an accompanied rise in the movement of counterfeit goods in the market.

A well established tenet in the legal domain is that "it is the substance that counts and must take precedence over mere form."

The advent of Trade Mark Rules in 2017 ("Rules) has seen many positive changes at the Trade Marks Registry ("Registry"). The objective of the Rules was simplification...

The Delhi High Court ("Delhi HC") vide its order dated May 15, 2024, in the matter of Jaikishan Kakubhai Saraf alias Jackie Shroff vs. The Peppy Store and Ors. [I.A. 10961/2024 IN CS(COMM) 389/2024].