3,988 results found

The High Court of Bombay, by way of its judgment dated 24.03.2026 in M/s. Lahoti Properties & Ors. v. Gangabhishan & Ors., has held that withdrawal of a suit with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action does not permit the plaintiff to introduce new or additional reliefs in the subsequent suit, ...

The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 25.03.2026 in the matter of Hanuman Prasad Sharma @ H.P. Sharma v. J. Mithyleshwar , held that objections relating to territorial jurisdiction must be raised...

In a concise yet telling order dated 10 December 2025, the Bombay High Court (Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.) has reaffirmed the primacy of party autonomy in Online Dispute resolution platform arbitration while simultaneously...

In order to alleviate difficulties faced by litigants and lawyers owing to the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdown, the Supreme Court of India had passed an order on 23rd March 2020...

On September 23, 2021, the Supreme Court withdrew the suspension of limitation that was in place since March 23, 2020, when COVID-19 pandemic gripped the country.

The matters approved by the Court for urgent hearing would be directly called out in the court.

Under India GST Law, importer in India was required to discharge GST under reverse charge on deemed value of ocean freight services under any CIF (i.e. Cost, Insurance and Freight) contract of import.

IPL, being a cash rich event, has always found itself in controversies including a recent one, on levying of taxes on the retailing of tickets.

The Supreme Court, through its judgment dated 24.02.2026 in S. Rajendran v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax...

The matter still pending before the SC and is now to be heard on April 4, 2019.

On August 29, 2022, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (‘NCLAT') dismissed the appeal filed by Sun Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (‘Informant/Appellant')...

On November 25, 2019, NCLAT dismissed an appeal filed against an order of CCI dated May 30, 2018 which rejected allegations of abuse of dominance against BMW India Private Limited and BMW India Financial Services Private Limited.

The pandemic of COVID-19 has severely affected functioning of various business activities across the globe and has posed a threat to legal services.

In March 2020, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of the prejudicial impact of the Covid-19 restrictions on compliance with limitation periods, and this led to Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No 3 of 2020.

The NCLAT held that such homebuyers are to be treated as financial creditors within their class and their claims must be incorporated in the resolution plan through an addendum...

National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai vide its order dated 3rd July, 2017, clarified that the application of moratorium under section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

The Supreme Court of India, in the matter titled as Bharat Mittal v. State of Rajasthan and Others , through its judgment dated 18.12.2025, held that the appellate court may direct deposit under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("NI Act") even against a director or authorized signatory convicted under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act.

While reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court underscored that the proviso to Section 372 CrPC was introduced with the objective of strengthening the participatory rights of victims in the criminal justice system.