704 results found

The Department of Parliamentary Affairs and Legislation, Government of Karnataka, has on February 03, 2024, notified the Karnataka Stamp (Amendment) Act, 2023 which has amended the stamp duty applicable on instruments ...

By an Order dated July 27, 2022, the Supreme Court (‘SC') in the case of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India, upheld the constitutional validity of various provisions...

In this solo episode of the Indialaw LLP Podcast, host Aditi Rana explores a recent Rajasthan High Court judgment that revisits a long-debated issue: the exclusion of Scheduled Tribes...

In this episode of Podcast Bites powered by IndiaLaw LLP, Nikita Dlima and Rahul Sundaram discuss the Gujarat High Court’s decision in Dolly Khilankumar Vadalia Nee Dolly Ketan Barai v. Union of India and Others.

The High Court held that while the executive is competent to prescribe cut-off dates, such classification must satisfy the twin tests under Article 14 of the Constitution. It was further observed that since the Circular created an artificial classification having no rational or nexus with its object of mitigating hardship, it is arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional. Accordingly, the Hon’ble High Court struck down the Clause B of the Circular.

Where the question of pursing a constitutional remedy is involved and invocation of writ jurisdiction is traceable to Article 226(1), the doctrine of forum non conveniens may rarely apply.

India's telecommunications sector undergoes a fundamental regulatory transformation as the Department of Telecommunications replaces the decades-old unified license framework with a streamlined authorisation-based system. The new regime introduces separate rule frameworks for principal, miscellaneous, and captive telecommunication services while establishing a digital single-window platform for regulatory interactions. Existing license holders now face critical decisions about migrating to the new authorisa

This Amendment brings ‘digital/ online media' under the regulatory purview of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.

In this episode, Vshrupt examines the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s decision in Smt. Shanti Singh & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

The GSTAT is notified to be established with effect from September 1, 2024. The Principal bench is constituted at New Delhi and State benches are constituted at different designated locations...

In a recent move, the Government of India has decided to adopt a new policy in respect of foreign investments in infrastructure companies in the securities market.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 06.07.2026 in Uday Narayan Shukla v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. , while reiterating the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution, dismissed a writ petition challenging an award of the Labour Court, upholding dismissal of employee from the service.

The IBBI, through notification dated 01.06.2026 has released the IBBI (Inspection and Investigation) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026 (“Inspection Amendment Regulations”) to amend the IBBI (Inspection and Investigation) Regulations, 2017 (“Inspection Principal Regulations”), in order to give effect to the changes brought about by the Amendment Act.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 15.06.2026 in Sunita v. Bajinder Kumar , dismissed a petition challenging the Trial Court’s order permitting inter alia the filing of a replication under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC, holding that leave to file a replication may be granted where it is necessary for effective adjudication of issues.

The High Court of Delhi, through its judgment dated 17.06.2026 in Anuj Goyal v. National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi & Ors. , dismissed a writ petition by holding that High Courts ought to ordinarily refrain from invoking their extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, where proceedings are pending before the competent tribunal.

Indigenous law is the law and legal orders Indigenous peoples have always had or that has been made or developed by Indigenous peoples. Aboriginal law is the law that public governments...

The Central Government has amended the rules relating to Importer-Exporter Code (IEC) vide Notification No. 48/2015-2020 dated 12 February 2021.

By this step, the Government aims to strengthen the domestic market and reduce the import from the neighbouring nations entering the Indian apparel market.