3,988 results found

Relief came for Patent Agent Examination (PAE) aspirants when IPO official website announced on July 19, 2016 that PAE will be conducted before December, 2016.

The question of interpretation of law to ensure that no miscarriage of justice ensues from the verdict has been up for consideration of the courts on many an occasion.

Copyrights vested in information of Clients and/or Customer Lists maintained by service providers has been an issue of disparity for the past several years.

The Single Bench order of Monsanto and Nuziveedu Seeds reaches the Division Bench of Delhi High Court as both parties prefer an appeal, aggrieved by parts of the order.

In effect, the Supreme Court held that a prior application for registration of a mark is of no assistance if the use of the said mark is commenced after twelve years that too after the rival's use of their mark.

Nike sought a permanent injunction against unauthorised usage of its registered trademark "NIKE and its "SWOOSH DEVICE" in the case of Nike Innovate C.V. v. Hina Imported Shoes and Ors. ...

A person is said to infringe a registered Trade Mark when he uses such registered Trade Mark as his trade name or part of his trade name or name of his business concern or part of the name of his business concern dealing in goods or services in respect of which the mark is registered. It is well settled principle of law that use of part of registered trade or phonetic similarity constitute infringement of trademark.

Recently in Make My Trip (India) Private Limited vs. Make My Travel (India) Private Limited CS(COMM) 889/2018, I.As. 6896/2018 & 8837/2018, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court...

Leading innovators of haptics, Immersions was founded in 1993. Immersions' touch feedback technology provides users with more enthralling feel of the digital world.

With the extension of lockdown for another two weeks effective May 4, 2020, the Administrative and General Supervision Committee of High Court of Delhi...

The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity ("APTEL"), through its judgment dated 03.02.2026 in Krishna Windfarms Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. CERC & Ors.

SPPL had dismantled a 12 MW generating unit on account of increase in cost and non-availability of bagasse and sought reduction of export capacity under the Force Majeure clause of the PPA. APTEL held that such circumstances are ‘usual and natural events' which could have been foreseen at the time of execution of the PPA and do not constitute a Force Majeure event.

Section 61(2) of the IBC provides that an appeal before NCLAT against any order passed by NCLT must be filed within 30 days.

The Court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not oust the jurisdiction of Civil Courts to decide upon the validity or cancellation of registered sale deeds.

The Supreme Court has observed that even after disclosure is made by a candidate about criminal cases pending against him, the employer would be well within his rights to consider...

The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 23.03.2026 in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. Manish Jain & Ors...

The High Court of Delhi, by way of its judgment dated 16.03.2026, in the matter of Directorate of Enforcement v. M/s. Mahanivesh Oils & Foods Pvt. Ltd.1, allowed the appeal against the order of the Single Judge...