Corporations have a separate legal entity and they are treated as a separate personality in law.

All the States/UTs must issue a Standing Order to their respective Police machinery to issue notices under Section 41-A of CrPC, 1973/Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 only through the mode of

The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of Sivakumar vs the Inspector of Police & Anr. (SLP (CRL) Nos. 5815-5816 of 2023)...

Detention of the Accused as an Under-Trial Prisoner is Not Warranted once their Properties are Attached. On July 2, 2024, the Bombay High Court, in case of Amod Vasantrao Mhetar Vs. State of Maharashtra

While hearing a suo moto case concerning ‘digital arrest fraud' on 17th November 2025, the Hon'ble Supreme Court requested the Solicitor General to provide an update on India's position on the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime.

It has been held in catena of judgements that Enforcement Directorate officials do not fall within the category of police officers.

On October 8, 2021, in the case of M/s Gimpex Private Limited vs. Manoj Goel1, the Supreme Court of India has held that a cheque...

Joint venture partnerships (JVP) have evolved over the years and while these have been successful in a majority of instances in India...

Deloitte Haskins and Sells LLP ("Deloitte") and BSR & Associates LLP ("BSR") served as the statutory auditors of IL&FS Financial Services Limited...

It can be considered to be an exemplary case, Frustrated over bad leave policy and long working hours, employees of leading Information Technology companies...

The constitutional validity and societal acceptance of live-in relationships have long been subjects of intense legal and social discourse in India.

The provisional attachment under the directions of enforcement authorities is subject to confirmation by the adjudicating authority.

The Supreme Court on December 3, 2019, in an appeal filed in the case of Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd, held that though the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ...

An alarming incident has been reported involving websites engaged in fraudulent and low cost trademark filings.

The Bombay High Court has held that the mere institution of criminal proceedings will not render a dispute non-arbitrable.

India's digital economy has created millions of new retail investors, but it has also opened the door to sophisticated fraudsters who impersonate banks, fintechs, and investment firms across messaging platforms. As these scams threaten not just individual victims but entire institutions through regulatory scrutiny and brand damage, Indian courts are evolving their approach from reactive measures to proactive infrastructure dismantling. With artificial intelligence now enabling hyper-realistic deepfakes and

The Karnataka High Court, in a significant ruling delivered on 30 June 2026 in Can Fin Homes Ltd. v. Nagarathnamma G.R. and Ors. (Writ Petition No. 17307 of 2026), has once again highlighted the independent and alternative nature of the remedies available to secured creditors under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, commonly known as the SARFAESI Act.

In an era increasingly defined by instant communication and digital convenience, the legal landscape is constantly grappling with the integration of technology into traditional processes.

The rapid digitization of communication has transformed how investors access financial advice and trading opportunities.

The inception of Goods and Services Tax (‘GST') marked a monumental shift in the taxation paradigm, consolidating various indirect levies into a singular levy.