3,986 results found

The applicants of all Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can directly file Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon'ble Supreme Court against any order of Intellectual...

With more than Twenty Seven million cases pending in the subordinate Courts across the country, there is a need to look beyond the traditional methods.

The Allahabad High Court in Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. v. State of U.P., held that the writ jurisdiction can be invoked to safeguard existing rights and not for seeking to establish any new right.

In this edition of Podcast Bites, powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Akriti Singhal discusses the Supreme Court’s significant directions to the State of Rajasthan to formulate a comprehensive policy for the introduction and promotion of the Rajasthani language in schools.

Unsuccessful sale processes, struggling lender, fund-raise and tender offer, vigorous activism, enhanced scrutiny of board responsibilities and litigation, terminated fund raise process and finally a right issue...

The CERC is the instant case decided to take the scheduled date of commissioning of the project as 13 months from the effective date of the PPA rather than the date of execution of the PPA.

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court transformed a routine anticipatory bail case into a landmark ruling for transgender rights in Tamil Nadu. Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan not only granted bail...

Citing the Supreme Court's decision in the Vodafone case, the Court held that the transaction should be reviewed as a whole, by resorting to the substance over form approach.

A Decree Holder seeks to execute an arbitral award of ₹385 crore through attachment and sale of properties, while Judgment Debtors argue they are undergoing Personal Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC, 2016. The central question is whether execution proceedings can continue when the statutory moratorium has expired but insolvency proceedings remain active, and whether this would grant preferential treatment disrupting the proposed repayment plan.

Dipak Rao, Senior Partner and Sana Singh, Associate at Singhania & Partners discuss the measures taken by the IP authorities about the functioning of the Intellectual Property offices and tribunals in India in the unprecedented COVID-19 scenario.

Relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in Anand Prasad Agarwalla v Tarkeshwar Prasad (2001 5 SCC 568), the Delhi High Court recently noted that, when deciding whether to grant an injunction application,...

The High Court of Delhi through its judgment dated 11.11.2025 in Manmohan Gaind v. Negolice India Pvt. Ltd , held that a cheque issued as a security may constitute a legally enforceable instrument under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("NI Act"), if any subsisting liability exists on the date of its presentation.

The EPFO has issued a circular on February 14 in relation to the procedure for initiation of inquiries by investigating officers under Section 7A of the EPF Act,...

The Supreme Court extended the term of Justice (Retd.) Manmohan Singh as Chairman of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).

The Supreme Court of India establishes the definitive framework for judicial interference in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This landmark ruling clarifies the boundaries of court intervention, emphasizing that courts cannot function as appellate bodies by re-evaluating evidence or substituting their own interpretations for those of arbitrators.

A batch of writ petitions arose from a common grievance that the GST authorities had uploaded show cause notices and order-in-originals only on the GST common portal under the tab “View Additional Notices and Orders,” without serving themin any other effective manner on the taxpayers. The lead matter was CWP-27139-2025, Luxmi Traders v. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Others, and the Court treated it as the lead case for all connected petitions.

In Bhagyalaxmi Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Babaldas Amtharam Patel & Ors., the Supreme Court of India clarifies the extent of a surety’s liability under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

In light of the current lock-down, the Supreme Court of India ordered all States to consider releasing some prisoners on parole to reduce overcrowding in prisons and to constitute a ‘High Powered Committee' which will decide on the matter.