838 results found

On December 02, 2004 the patent panel of the district court in Düsseldorf, Germany, handed down its decision in a 20 million Euro patent dispute between subsidiaries of the two world market leaders for wet shaving blades, U.S. companies Gillette and Energizer.

Discover the latest insights into a European automotive supply chain at a critical turning point. The metaphor of the "eternal patient" has never felt more fitting: distressed suppliers are repeatedly revived through...

The European Union's Omnibus package has raised expectations that sustainability reporting will become simpler, yet companies are discovering that the real challenges lie not in regulatory requirements themselves, but in operational implementation. From data availability issues in EU Taxonomy assessments to structural complexities in multi-business corporate groups, organizations face significant hurdles in establishing effective non-financial reporting processes.

On January 19, 2021, the 10th amendment to the Act Against Restraints of Competition ("GWB"), the "GWB Digitization Act," came into force. The central regulatory subject of the amendment is the new...

The EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D) stresses that industry initiatives (next to multi-stakeholder initiatives) can constitute helpful tools for allowing covered companies...

AlixPartners' 2025 DACH Debt Report provides an in-depth analysis of the changing financial landscape across the region, as companies respond to shifting economic conditions and new challenges.

The June edition of the BUREN German Desk Newsletter examines critical developments in foreign investment screening, M&A transactions, and regulatory compliance for German companies operating in the Netherlands.

Material Terms and Conditions of a Convertible Loan Agreement and Drafting Tips.

Oppenhoff has acquired Ursula Rutovitz as new Head of Business Development & Marketing. The former German Head of the TMF Group has been supporting the firm...

A German court has ruled that an employee with a company-funded D&O insurance policy can be held fully liable for millions in damages after falling victim to a CEO fraud scheme. The landmark decision challenges traditional employee liability protections and raises critical questions about the interplay between insurance coverage and workplace negligence standards.