14,422 results found

The Husky Energy appeal highlights how alignment across structure, operations, and cross-border reporting influences interpretive outcomes.

Disputes between members and leadership of religious organizations can sometimes turn quite heated, and may lead to members making public statements...

The Court of Appeal released a new decision on dependency in a priority dispute between Intact and Allstate, linked below.

Foreign parties often assume that if their contract points to a foreign jurisdiction or applies a foreign law, then any dispute should be dealt with there. But the Court of Appeal for Ontario has recently reminded...

Following are the summaries for this week's civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

There were seven substantive civil decisions released this week, and three of note.

In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, Courts across Canada have weighed the seriousness of the situation and the importance of prioritizing the health and safety of all court participants.

Calculating damages for pain and suffering is not a straightforward analysis for a judge or jury. There are a number of factors that are considered when determining the amount.

A January 23, 2017 article in the Toronto Star has confirmed something many of our personal injury clients already know – it takes a long time to get to trial in civil courts in the GTA.

A Deputy Small Claims Court Judge who made the decision to allow a trial to continue on its second day notwithstanding that one of the parties failed to show up has been overturned by the Divisional Court.

Are submissions, evidence and statements made in a regulatory proceeding subject to the same protection of absolute privilege that applies in a court? Not always; it depends on the proceeding.

The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed in Beals v. Saldanha that the principles of comity must be applied when considering and enforcing judgments of other courts.

The Alberta Court of Appeal recently provided guidance on how a disciplinary panel might consider a registrant's medical conditions or personal stress when imposing a sanction.

The plaintiffs brought a motion to amend their amended statement of claim in an action that, in ten years, had not yet proceeded to discoveries.

At first glance, the result of the decision in Ross River Dena Council v Government of Yukon 2012 YKCA 14, this past December 2012, it is no longer possible for individuals eighteen years or older to enter onto land, and claim it as their own for the purposes of prospecting and mining.

November 1, 2017- Green and Spiegel Associate Aris Daghighian was part of the winning team who appeared before the Supreme Court in Tran v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness).

A jury had been convened, on the respondent/defendant’s request, to assess the damages suffered by the appellant/plaintiff as a result of a motor vehicle accident for which fault was admitted.

Litigants sometimes believe they must allege maximal goals if they are going to achieve their actual objective. If you needed a fresh caution against overreaching, the costs ruling in Guttin v. Creber, 2026 ONSC 4507, delivers it. After an oppression dispute involving B Con Engineering Inc. and BCE Realty Ltd., the Ontario Superior Court fixed costs against the notionally successful applicants. This was because, despite the applicants’ limited success on disclosure and sale process issues, their big ticket allegations and remedies did not land.