Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,815 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Protecting Product Advertising

    The essence of a passing-off action is a misrepresentation and resultant confusion in the minds of the public which causes or is likely to cause damage to the plaintiff.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
    Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
  • Article

    Re: Sound Tariff – 6B Or Not 6B

    As noted in a previous blog post on Re:Sound tariffs, Re:Sound Tariff No. 6.B (Use of Recorded Music to Accompany Physical Activities), sets the royalties to be paid for the performance in public or communication to the public of published sound recordings in any indoor or outdoor venue for the purposes of fitness, training, skating, dance instruction or any other physical activity.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Stewart McKelvey
    Stewart McKelvey
Article

Supreme Court Says Copyright Tariffs Not Mandatory On Works Managed By Collective Society

The Supreme Court of Canada, in a rare copyright decision, unanimously held that copyright collectives cannot charge fees to those who decline their contracts.
CanadaIntellectual Property
Smart & Biggar
Smart & Biggar
  • Article

    Swimming Against The Stream: U.S. Supreme Court To Hear Appeal Of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

    On January 10, the United States Supreme Court announced it would hear an appeal from the Second Circuit decision of WNET v. Aereo, Inc. on a technical, yet fundamentally important copyright issue.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Smart & Biggar
    Smart & Biggar
  • Article

    Take Action: Protect Your Intellectual Property

    When your brand, design, or original work is used without permission, it's critical to act quickly to protect your rights.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Prowse Barrette
    Prowse Barrette
  • Article

    Technological Neutrality And Copyright: Supreme Court Grants Leave To Clarify Scope In CBC V SODRAC

    The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in another copyright case, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation / Société Radio-Canada v. SODRAC 2003 Inc.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    McCarthy Tétrault
    McCarthy Tétrault
  • Article

    That's A Wrap: BC Supreme Court Enforces Website Terms Of Use And Validates "Browse Wrap" Agreements In Century 21 v Zoocasa

    In "Century 21 Canada Limited Partnership v Rogers Communications Inc.", the BC Supreme Court upheld the validity of the so-called "browse wrap" agreements and awarded damages against Zoocasa and its parent Rogers for Zoocasa’s breach of the Century 21 website terms of use when it pulled listings from the Century 21 website for use on its own real estate listing search engine.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Article

    The Customs Request For Assistance Regime For Counterfeit Goods May Be In Force In Early 2015

    Bill C-8, the Combating Counterfeit Products Act (the "Act"), received Royal Assent on December 9, 2014.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Smart & Biggar
    Smart & Biggar
  • Article

    The Developing Landscape For Detaining Counterfeit Goods At The Canadian Border

    The manufacture and sale of counterfeit goods is a global phenomenon, which has been referred to as "the crime of the century."
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Smart & Biggar
    Smart & Biggar
  • Article

    The Queen's Own Copyright: Supreme Court Of Canada To Decide On Copyright Ownership For Works Submitted To Government Registry

    On Thursday June 21st, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal in the matter of Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. Teranet Inc. Both the application for leave to appeal and the application for leave...
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Smart & Biggar
    Smart & Biggar
  • Article

    The Value Of A Copyrighted Photograph Is Not Necessarily In The Eye Of The Beholder

    In the May 2018 decision, Gaudreau c Néomédia inc., the Québec Small Claims Court considered the amount of damages to award for the unauthorized use of a copyrighted photograph.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Aird & Berlis LLP
    Aird & Berlis LLP
  • Article

    Use Agreements To Capture And Control IP Like It's A Pokémon

    In our previous article "Pokémon GO Shows How to Augment Reality and your Intellectual Property", we discussed the value and diversity of the Pokémon Intellectual Property ("IP") portfolio.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Smart & Biggar
    Smart & Biggar
  • Article

    Use Of Another's Registered Trademarks In Metatags Not Infringing … This Time

    Red Label Vacations operates an online travel business. It sued a competitor, 411 Travel Buys, over the latter's use of metatags comprising Red Label's trademarks, including "Red Tag Vacations" and "shop, compare, & pay less."
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Smart & Biggar
    Smart & Biggar
  • Article

    What Do You Mean I Don't Own My Own Logo?

    That is not enough to show copyright.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Aird & Berlis LLP
    Aird & Berlis LLP
  • Article

    What’s In A Name? (Why There Is No Copyright In Your Name)

    The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench recently had to deal with a bizarre case in which the defendant obtained a Mastercard from Bank of Montreal, used it for 15 years, made payments on it for 15 years and then stopped paying it: Bank of Montreal v. Rogozinsky, 2014 ABQB 771.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Stewart McKelvey
    Stewart McKelvey
  • Article

    Why You Should Act Now To Protect Your Intellectual Property In Canada

    Significant amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act (the "Act") have been passed, but are not yet in effect.
    CanadaIntellectual Property
    Field Law
    Field Law
  • Article

    Trade Alert: WTO Challenge To China’s Intellectual Property Protection Regime

    On September 25, 2007, the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO) established a panel to review China's measures concerning the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights.
    CanadaInternational Law
    McCarthy Tétrault
    McCarthy Tétrault
  • Article

    2014 In Review: Ten Important Decisions And Developments Of The Past Year

    This video presents our annual review of top legal highlights of 2014.
    CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • Article

    Appeal From Refusal To Approve Class Action Settlement Is Interlocutory

    In Ontario, a settlement in a class action must be approved by the Court. The same is true of class counsel's fees.
    CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Article

    Doan v Clearview Inc And The Identification Of Class Members

    The Federal Court recently released its decision in Doan v Clearview Inc, 2023 FC 1612, in which the Court distinguished a situation where there is no basis in fact for proving that two or more...
    CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Fasken
    Fasken
  • Showing 361–380 of 1815 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics