Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

135 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    ECJ Rules On Exhaustion Of Plant Variety Rights

    On 20 October 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "ECJ") delivered its judgment in case C-140/10 Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV ("GKE") v Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens, addressing two questions referred to it by the Supreme Court (the "Referring Court").
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    ECJ Ruling In IP Translator Case

    On 19 June 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down its judgment in the "IP Translator" case.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
Article

Brussels Court Of Appeal Applies And Clarifies Criteria For Parallel Importation Of Medicines

In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal of Brussels has issued an interesting judgment discussing the obligations imposed on parallel importers of medicines.
BelgiumIntellectual Property
Van Bael & Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    European Union Intellectual Property Office Allows Registration Of Bacardi Bottle As Trade Mark

    On 21 December 2018, the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office allowed the registration of the Bacardi bottle as a figurative European Union trade mark.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Aldi's Buval Beer Sign Held To Infringe Jupiler Trademark

    InBev brought a cease-and-desist action before the Court for infringement of its Jupiler trademark.
    BelgiumIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Brussels Commercial Court Declares Louboutin’s Red Sole Trade Mark Invalid

    On 20 March 2014, the President of the Brussels Commercial Court ruled on a dispute between Christian Louboutin and Van Dalen Footwear B.V.
    BelgiumIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Brussels Commercial Court Rules On Protection Of Red Bull’s Colour Trade Mark

    On 8 June 2011, the Brussels Commercial Court (the "Court") issued a judgment in a case between Powerdrinks Group BVBA ("Powerdrinks") and Red Bull GmbH ("Red Bull"), two producers of energy drinks, regarding the protection of Red Bull’s colour trade mark.
    BelgiumIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    ECJ On Trade Mark Protection Of Quality Labels

    On 11 April 2019, the ECJ issued its judgment in the ÖKO-Test Verlag case (C-690/17) on the interpretation of Regulation 207/2009 on the European Union trade mark and Directive 2008/95 on the approximation of the laws ...
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    EU General Court Rules On Acquired Distinctive Character Of Kit Kat Shape Mark

    First, the Court looked at Cadbury's assertion that the trade mark had not been used with respect to all the relevant goods.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Parallel Trade: Rebranding Of Generic Medicine To Originator Brand Name Constitutes Trade Mark Infringement

    In reaching this conclusion, the Court referred to the Belgian regulatory framework which embraces the principle of "therapeutic freedom" which, as a rule, prohibits substitution in the deliverance of medicines.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    EU General Court Invalidates Design For Infringing Earlier 3D Trade Mark

    On 23 April 2013, the General Court of the European Union (the "GC") upheld an earlier decision of the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to invalidate a registered Community design ("RCD") of Su-Shan Chen ("Chen") on account of an infringement of an earlier registered 3D trade mark of AM Denmark A/S ("AM Denmark").
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    OHIM And National Trade Mark Offices Clarify Assessment Of Likelihood Of Confusion For Trade Marks With Low Distinctive Character

    The Common Practice set out in the Common Communication emphasises the importance of non-distinctive or weak components of a trade mark in the overall assessment of likelihood of confusion on relative grounds cases.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Second Advocate General Opinion In Louboutin Red Sole Trade Mark Case

    On 6 February 2018, Advocate General Szpunar (the "AG") issued a second opinion in the dispute opposing Christian Louboutin ("Louboutin") against Van Haeren Schoenen BV ("Van Haeren") .
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Beatles Stop ‘BEATLE’ Electric Mobility Aids Trade Mark

    In its judgment of 29 March 2012, the General Court ("GC") confirmed the decision of the Office of Harmonisation for the Internal Market.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Infringements On IP Rights In The Metaverse: How To Handle Them And What Hurdles Are There To Take?

    Today the metaverse is still a mystery to many. There are more questions than answers. Particularly in relation intellectual property rights ("IPR") infringements in these emerging worlds.
    BelgiumTechnology
    Gevers
    Gevers
  • Article

    Debranding And Rebranding Imported Products Constitutes Trade Mark Infringement

    On 25 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union held in case C-129/17, Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha Ltd & MCFE BV v. Duma Forklifts NV and GSI International BVBA, that the debranding and rebranding ...
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    European Union Intellectual Property Office Protects Trade Mark Of Beats Electronics Against Later Similar Trade Mark Of Competitor

    On 19 December 2018, the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office found in favour of Beats Electronics and annulled a decision of the EUIPO's Opposition Division of 29 March 2018.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    Ice Watch Packaging Is Unfair Competition But No Infringement Of Lego Brick Trade Mark

    In a judgment of 5 December 2011, the Commercial Court of Brussels (the "Court") rejected claims brought by Lego Juris AS ("Lego") that the packaging of watches sold by TKS SA ("TKS") infringed the shape trade mark of its Lego bricks.
    BelgiumIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    ECJ On Tripp Trapp 3D Trade Mark

    Since 1972, Stokke has marketed on the Scandinavian market a children’s chair called the ‘Tripp Trapp’. Since 1995 it has also commercialised its product on the Dutch market.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Article

    ECJ Provides Guidance On Loss Of Distinctiveness Of Trade Marks

    The ECJ provided guidance on the circumstances under which a trade mark may lose distinctiveness and become generic.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Van Bael & Bellis
    Van Bael & Bellis
  • Showing 61–80 of 135 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics