Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

8 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    EU Commission Updates Antitrust Framework For Technology Transfer Agreements

    The European Commission has introduced a revised Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation and updated Guidelines, effective May 1, 2026, fundamentally reshaping how technology licensing agreements are assessed under EU competition law. The framework introduces significant changes including express provisions for data licensing, extended grace periods for market share thresholds, and new requirements for technology pools and collective negotiations. Companies have until April 30, 2027, to align existin
    AfghanistanAntitrust/Competition Law
    Greenberg Traurig
    Greenberg Traurig
  • Article

    Acceleration Of Adoption Of Reusable Fibre-based E-commerce Packaging

    DS Smith and its partners have launched the Reuse Fast Track initiative, Europe's first large-scale reuse acceleration program using existing industrial solutions for fiber-based e-commerce packaging. The program aims to circulate 250,000 reusable packages within 12 months while gathering critical data on consumer behavior and return rates. How will intellectual property strategies enable the scaling of circular packaging systems aligned with the EU's upcoming Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation?
AfghanistanIntellectual Property
Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
  • Article

    A New Frontier For Added Subject-Matter At The EPO?

    The European Patent Office's recent referral of case T 873/24 to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may extend last summer's landmark G 1/24 decision on claim interpretation to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter.
    AfghanistanIntellectual Property
    Crowell & Moring LLP
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article

    The Decision in G 1/25: A More Relaxed Approach to Description Amendments in Europe?

    The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued its decision in G 1/25, addressing the contentious practice of description amendments in European patent applications. This decision establishes new guidelines on when patent descriptions must be modified to align with claims, potentially reshaping prosecution strategies across Europe. The ruling adopts a middle ground between the EPO's traditional approach requiring extensive amendments and recent case law suggesting such changes lack explici
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    G 1/25: Description Amendments At The EPO - Business As Usual?

    The Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued its decision in G 1/25, addressing a fundamental question in European patent practice: when must patent descriptions be amended to align with amended claims? This landmark ruling establishes new guidance on the relationship between claims and descriptions, building upon the interpretive framework set forth in G 1/24 and potentially reshaping how practitioners approach description amendments at the EPO.
    AfghanistanIntellectual Property
    Potter Clarkson LLP
    Potter Clarkson LLP
  • Article

    EPO Guidelines For Examination: 2026 Amendments & Updates

    The European Patent Office has released its 2026 Guidelines for Examination, incorporating two landmark rulings that fundamentally change how patent claims are interpreted and what constitutes prior art. These updates introduce mandatory use of patent descriptions in claim interpretation, eliminate the reproducibility requirement for marketed products as prior art, and establish the EPO's first formal guidance on artificial intelligence in patent proceedings.
    AfghanistanIntellectual Property
    Murgitroyd
    Murgitroyd
  • Article

    EPO v UPC: How The EPO’s And UPC’s Approaches To Validity Give Us Food For Thought When Drafting And Prosecuting Patent Applications Destined For Europe (Part 1)

    The Unified Patent Court's approach to claim interpretation has prompted significant changes at the European Patent Office, creating new considerations for patent drafting and prosecution. This analysis examines how recent decisions from both tribunals affect the interpretation of patent claims, particularly regarding the role of definitions in patent descriptions and their impact on claim scope.
    AfghanistanIntellectual Property
    HGF Law
    HGF Law
  • Article

    IA, Droit D'auteur Et Charge De La Preuve

    Votre œuvre a-t-elle servi à entraîner une IA ? Aujourd'hui, c'est à vous de le prouver. Demain, ce sera peut-être à l'entreprise d'IA de prouver qu'elle ne l'a pas fait.
    AfghanistanIntellectual Property
    Haas Avocats
    Haas Avocats
  • Showing 1–8 of 8 results

    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics