Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2017

Development Of Court Practice On Thin Capitalization Cases

On 24 January 2017 the Commercial Court of Arkhangelsk Oblast delivered a judgement in case No. А05-9115/2016 (the "Judgement") under the claim of Severnoye Siyaniye...

RussiaTax

On 24 January 2017 the Commercial Court of Arkhangelsk Oblast delivered a judgement in case No. А05-9115/2016 (the "Judgement") under the claim of Severnoye Siyaniye (Northern Lights) Oil Company Limited Liability Company (the "Company").

The case is noteworthy because the tax authorities applied thin capitalization rules to a controlled transaction (a loan agreement) between a lender (a Cypriot company) and a borrower (a Russian company). This was even though the Cypriot company did not participate directly or indirectly in the Russian company and the parties to the loan relationship did not have a common holding company in order to be considered sister companies.

As follows from the Judgement, the court considered that in the periods of 2012-2014 being audited the Company should have withheld tax when paying loan interest to the Cypriot company at the 10% tax rate (the general tax rate on dividends under the Russia-Cyprus double tax treaty). The Company paid the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from