Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Restricting Competition Or Protecting Interests? Navigating Non-Compete Agreements In Nigeria

Non-compete agreements, also known as "covenants not to compete" or "contracts in restraint of trade," have always attracted legal scrutiny in many jurisdictions, including Nigeria.

NigeriaAntitrust/Competition Law

INTRODUCTION

Non-compete agreements, also known as "covenants not to compete" or "contracts in restraint of trade," have always attracted legal scrutiny in many jurisdictions, including Nigeria. This scrutiny has been intensified in Nigeria following the enactment of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018 (the "FCCPA"), which seeks to promote fairness and competition across Nigerian markets, including the labour market, ensuring that business practices do not unduly disrupt market dynamics.

Traditionally, agreements restricting an individual's ability to freely engage in business or trade have been viewed with suspicion and are often considered anti-competitive.1 In some cases, these restrictions could suppress innovation, limit consumer choices, or create monopolistic market conditions. However, there are situations where carefully structured limitations are necessary to maintain fairness and healthy competition.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from