Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2015

Judgment summary - Islington Park Ltd v ACE Insurance Ltd and others

Should the cost of complying with current building regulations be taken into account when determining the cost of repair?

New ZealandReal Estate and Construction

[2014] NZCA 446, (2014) 18 ANZ Insurance Cases 62-038

Islington Park Ltd owns a complex of 32 buildings which were the Islington Freezing Works. The defendants, ACE Insurance Ltd, IAG New Zealand Ltd, QBE Insurance (International) Ltd, and The New India Assurance Co Ltd, insured the buildings. Seven of the 32 buildings were damaged in the September 2010 and February 2011 earthquakes.

It is common ground between the parties that the functional replacement cost for all of the buildings is in excess of $40 million, while the depreciated replacement cost is in excess of $20 million.The insured arranged cover with an agreed value for the sum insured of $9 million. Both the insured and the insurers knew that the property was being underinsured. Because of the underinsurance, the insurers raised the possibility of including a condition that the policy would be subject to average. Instead of an average clause, the parties agreed to a "Basis of Settlement" clause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from