Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2010

Testing the Boundaries of Legal Privilege

The appropriate boundaries of legal privilege have been considered recently by senior appellate courts both here and in Europe, with markedly different outcomes.

New ZealandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The appropriate boundaries of legal privilege have been considered recently by senior appellate courts both here and in Europe, with markedly different outcomes. 

The judgments deal with different types of legal privilege - the European Court of Justice (ECJ) with legal professional privilege and the New Zealand Supreme Court with litigation privilege.  Taken together, however, they illustrate some important underlying differences in approach between the different jurisdictions.

Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission (Case C 550/07 P)

Akzo Nobel arose as a consequence of an investigation of Akzo and Akcros by the European Commission (EC) for suspected breaches of European competition law. During inspections of the business premises of the two plastics companies in February 2003, the EC took copies of a number of communications between executives and in-house legal counsel.  Akzo and Akcros objected to the EC's subsequent use of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from