Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2015

Supreme Court supports arbitration agreements

The Supreme Court ruled that parties cannot avoid promises to arbitrate by seeking High Court summary judgment instead.

New ZealandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court has clarified New Zealand's arbitration jurisprudence by ruling that parties generally cannot avoid promises to arbitrate by seeking High Court summary judgment instead.

The context

Zurich Australian Insurance v Cognition Education [2014] NZSC 188, delivered on 19 December, is the Supreme Court's third arbitration decision and its second this year.

In June, the Court had set aside an arbitration award on the basis that the parties had invalidated their arbitration agreement through a drafting error. This raised fears in some quarters that the Court may be inclining towards a technical, or even paternalistic, approach to supporting arbitration. Those fears have been mollified in Zurich v Cognition.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from