Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2011

Goodridge appeal reaffirms accepted practice

The Australian Federal Court in Leveraged Equities Limited v Goodridge has reaffirmed accepted practice regarding novations and assignments in the loan syndication and securitisation markets. This should lay to rest concerns raised in the first instance decision, Goodridge v Macquarie Bank Limited, almost a year ago. But the relief may be temporary as Mr Goodridge has indicated that he will appeal the court’s decision to the Australian High Court.

New ZealandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Background

The background to the case was summarised in our Brief Counsel of March 2010.

In brief, the judge held that Leverage Equities, the assignee of a margin loan contract, had not given proper notice to Mr Goodridge when demanding a margin call.

The judge also found that the transfer of the margin loan contract from Macquarie Bank to Leverage Equities was ineffective because Mr Goodridge had not consented to the transfer and the loan was incapable of assignment.

It was this finding that caused most concern as it had potentially significant ramifications for syndicated loan transfers and the assignment of financial assets in securitisations. It is this aspect of the judgment, which the Federal Court in Leveraged Equities Limited v Goodridge [2011] FCAFC 3 has now overturned by allowing the appeal, which is of most interest from a New Zealand perspective.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from