Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 FEBRUARY 2026

Zuru vs. Lego: A Matter Of Compatibility

In this article, we discuss a rare and long-awaited New Zealand Intellectual Property (IP) court judgment, one that seems to have generated significant interest, Zuru New Zealand Ltd v Lego Holdings A/S (2025) NZCA 650...

New ZealandIntellectual Property

In this article, we discuss a rare and long-awaited New Zealand Intellectual Property (IP) court judgment, one that seems to have generated significant interest, Zuru New Zealand Ltd v Lego Holdings A/S (2025) NZCA 650, 10 December 2025.

The issue of compatibility

The case focused on the issue of 'compatibility' in the context of trade mark law. The judgment, we're told...

'provides long awaited clarity for businesses on the lawful use of another party's trade mark, particularly in the context of advertising goods or services by reference to the goods or services of another trader'.

The parties to the dispute - there's Zuru

There's a company in New Zealand called Zuru New Zealand. The company makes, and has for some time made, a wide range of plastic toy building bricks. These toy bricks are sold under the trade mark MAX BUILD MORE.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from