Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2011

When are leased premises ‘untenantable’?

Christchurch earthquakes and resulting insurance issues. Leases terminated damage.

New ZealandInsurance
Crossley Gates
Crossley Gates
Peter Leman
Peter Leman
Kathryn Pengelly
Kathryn Pengelly

The Christchurch earthquakes have resulted in many insurance issues. One of the more unexpected ones is whether leases have come to an end because of damage to the building, or prevention of access to it. This turns on whether the premises are untenantable. Coverage for Landlords under business interpretation policies usually turns on this.

The High Court's recent decision in Russell v Robinson (1 April 2011) provides us with a timely reminder of the meaning of the word 'untenantable' as it applies to leased premises.

The case involved a four year lease, on the ADLS form (4th edition 2002), of the first floor of a three storey building. On the first day of the lease, a serious fire broke out as a result of work being undertaken for the tenants. There was extensive structural damage, floors were burnt through, partition walls were damaged and the electrical and air conditioning systems were destroyed. The estimate for the restoration of the premises was 9-10

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from