Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2015

Judgment summary - Tower Insurance Limited v Skyward Aviation 2008 Limited

Discussion of a recent insurance-related case arising out of the Christchurch earthquake.

New ZealandInsurance

[2014] NZSC 185

Skyward Aviation 2008 Limited owned a property in Burwood, Christchurch (the property) with a 207m2 early 1900s villa home (the house) and a 64m2 free-standing sleep-out built in 2009 (the sleep-out). Both the house and the sleep-out were damaged in the earthquakes, and the property is within the residential red zone.

Skyward and Tower were unable to reach agreement on how to calculate the amount to be paid to Skyward for the house.

The policy provided for four alternative options for settlement. There are:

  1. the full replacement value of the house at the situation; or
  2. the full replacement value of the house on another site chosen by Skyward. This cost must not be greater than rebuilding the house at the situation; or

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from