Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2015

Official Information Act implementation often ill-informed

There were a number of "increasing risks and vulnerabilities" to be addressed if the Act was to achieve its purpose.

New ZealandGovernment, Public Sector

The Chief Ombudsman's report into the implementation of the Official Information Act (OIA) finds that non-compliance is often the result of uninformed or ill-informed application rather than deliberate.

To reduce this problem, her office will produce a number of tools to assist agencies to meet their OIA obligations.

Context

The Ombudsman considers that the OIA is a "key tool and safeguard in New Zealand's democracy" and agrees with the Court of Appeal that "the permeating importance of the Act is such that it is entitled to be ranked as a constitutional measure".

It represented a culture change when it was passed in 1982, as evidenced in its title and the fact that it replaced the Official Secrets Act 1951. The basic tenet on which the OIA is founded is that official information held by the government should be made available to the public unless there is good reason for withholding it, the fundamental idea being to increase public participation

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from