Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2019

Recent developments in work health and safety sentencing

These cases show that substantial discounts for mitigating factors can still be obtained in appropriate circumstances.

New ZealandEmployment and HR

When the High Court released its decision in Stumpmaster v WorkSafe1 last year, it not only set new guideline bands for fines, but also commented on the level of discounts given for mitigating factors. This article considers the effect this comment has had on recent fines.

We also review the recent High Court decision on reparation awards in Oceana Gold v WorkSafe.2

Stumpmaster v WorkSafe

In Stumpmaster, the High Court decided to review the level of discounts routinely being given for reparation already paid, remorse, co-operation, and a previous good record. Decisions released under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 have discounts for mitigating factors mostly either 25 or 30 per cent, and occasionally higher. The Court decided that:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from